Character, attitude and disposition

Article English OPEN
Webber, Jonathan (2015)

Recent debate over the empirical psychological presuppositions of virtue ethics has focused on reactive behavioural dispositions. But there are many character traits that cannot be understood properly in this way. Such traits are well described by attitude psychology. Moreover, the findings of attitude psychology support virtue ethics in three ways. First, they confirm the role of habituation in the development of character. Further, they show virtue ethics to be compatible with the situation manipulation experiments at the heart of the recent debate. Finally, they show how the cognitive-affective theory of personality and the two-system theory of behavioural cognition are compatible, thereby undermining the current empirical challenge to virtue ethics. Empirical research into the nature and development of attitudes should therefore be central to philosophical discussions of virtue and character.
  • References (15)
    15 references, page 1 of 2

    Annas, Julia. 2005. Comments on John Doris' Lack of Character. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 636-47.

    Aristotle. NE. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Christopher Rowe. Introduction by Sarah Broadie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Aronson, Elliot, and Judson Mills. 1959. The Effect of Initiation Severity on Liking for a Group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 59: 177-181.

    Axsom, Danny and Joel Cooper. 1985. Cognitive Dissonance and Psychotherapy: The Role of Effort Justification in Inducing Weight Loss. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21: 149-160.

    Cacioppo, John T., Richard E. Petty, Chuan Feng Kao, and Regina Rodriguez. 1986. Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: An Individual Difference Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (5): 1032-1043.

    Rees, Clea F., and Jonathan Webber. 2013. Constancy, Fidelity, and Integrity. In The Handbook of Virtue Ethics, edited by Stan van Hooft and Nicole Saunders. Durham: Acumen.

    Roskos-Ewoldson, David R. and Russell H. Fazio 1992. On the Orienting Value of Attitudes: Attitude Accessibility as a Determinant of an Object's Attraction of Visual Attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63: 198-211.

    Russell, Daniel C. 2009. Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Sabini, John, Michael Siepmann, and Julia Stein. 2001. The Really Fundamental Attribution Error in Social Psychological Research. Psychological Inquiry 12: 1-15.

    Snibbe, Alana Conner, and Hazel Rose Markus. 2005. You Can't Always Get What You Want: Educational Attainment, Agency, and Choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (4): 703-720.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Online Research @ Cardiff - IRUS-UK 0 149
Share - Bookmark