

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Infrastructures for digital research: new opportunities and challenges
Infrastructures for digital research: new opportunities and challenges
No abstract available.
16 references, page 1 of 2
Cordell , Ryan. 2015. “Reprinting, Circulation, and the Network Author in Antebellum Newspapers”. In: American Literary History 27.3. htp://ryancordell.org/research/reprinting-circulation-and-the-network-author-inantebellum-newspapers/
Ell , Paul S., and Hughes, Lorna M. 2013. “E-Infrastructure in the humanities”. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 7.1-2: 24-40.
ENUMERATE. 2014. Survey Report on Digitisation in European Cultural Heritage Institutions. http://www.enumerate.eu/fileadmin/ENUMERATE/documents/ENUMERATE-Digitisation-Survey-2014.pdf
Hall, Gary. 2012. “Has critical theory run out of time for data-driven scholarship?”. In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by M. Gold, 128-132. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hitchcock , Tim. 2013. “Confronting the digital: or how academic history writing lost the plot.” Cultural and Social History 10.1: 9-23.
Hughes, Lorna M. 2012. “Live and kicking: the impact and sustainability of digital collections in the humanities”. In Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012, edited by C. Mills, M. Pidd. and E. Ward. Shefield: HRI Online Publications, 2012. htp://www.hrionline.ac.uk/openbook/chapter/ dhc-hughes (accessed April 11th 2016) .
-.“Finding the Belgian Refugees in cymru1914.org”. 2016. In Soon Gone , Long Forgoten - uncovering British responses to Belgian refugees during the First World War, special edition of Immigrants and Minorities, 34.2. The data for this graph is accessible at htp://dx.doi.org/10.5525/gla.researchdata.301 .
Hughes, Lorna M., Paul S. Ell, Gareth A.G Knight, and Milena Dobreva. 2015. “Assessing and measuring impact of a digital collection in the humanities: an analysis of the SPHERE (Stormont Parliamentary Hansards: Embedded in Research and Education) project”. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 30.2: 183-198. doi:10.1093/llc/fqt054 . [OpenAIRE]
Liu, Alan. 2012. “Where is cultural criticism in the Digital Humanities?.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by M. Gold, 490-509. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Nicholas , David, David Clark and A. Watkinson. 2014. “Log Usage Analysis: What it Discloses about Use, Information Seeking and Trustworthiness”. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology 4.1: 23-37. [OpenAIRE]
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average download downloads 32 citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!
- 32downloads


No abstract available.