Co-authorship trends in the field of management : facts and perceptions

Article English OPEN
Liu, Chengwei; Olivola, Christopher Yves; Kovács, Balázs;
(2016)

We explore the perceptions, preferences, and motivations that contribute to a widely recognized phenomenon: the continuous rise of coauthorship within the field of management. Using data from Web of Science, we first confirm that the average number of authors on publish... View more
  • References (41)
    41 references, page 1 of 5

    --------------------------- Insert Figure 1 about here ---------------------------

    To examine management researchers' perceptions of co-authorship trends and their Gioia, D. A., & Corley, K. G. (2002). Being good versus looking good: Business school rankings and the Circean transformation from substance to image. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 107-120.

    Hagen, N. T. (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: sharing authorship credit equitably-not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84(3), 785-793.

    Hunter, L., & Leahey, E. (2008). Collaborative research in sociology: Trends and contributing factors. The American Sociologist, 39(4), 290-306.

    Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.

    Korte, C. (1972). Pluralistic ignorance about student radicalism. Sociometry, 35(4), 576-587.

    Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 632-662.

    Lariviere, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211-213.

    Lewis, J. M., Ross, S., & Holden, T. (2012). The how and why of academic collaboration: Disciplinary differences and policy implications. Higher Education, 64(5), 693-708.

    Lukovits, I., & Vinkler, P. (1995). Correct credit distribution: A model for sharing credit among coauthors. Social Indicators Research, 36(1), 91-98.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark