Background and aims. There is uncertainty about the extent or even existence of sex differences in the mean and variability of reasoning test scores ( Jensen, 1998; Lynn, 1994, ; Mackintosh, 1996). This paper analyses the Cognitive Abilities Test (CAT) scores of a large... View more
Arnot, M., David, M., & Weiner, G. (1996). Educational reform and gender equality in schools. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.
Caplan, P. J. (1979). Beyond the box score: A search for boundary conditions in aggression and achievement behaviour. In Maher, B. A. (Ed.), Progress in Experimental Personality Research (Vol. 9, p41-87). New York: Academic Press Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Coe, R. (2004). Issues arising from the use of effect sizes in analysing and reporting research. in Schagen, I. & Elliott, K. (Eds.) (2004). But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cole, N. S. (1997). The ETS Gender study: How females and males perform in educational settings. Princeton, NJ: Education Testing Service.
Deary, I., Thorpe, G., Wilson, V., Starr, J. M., & Whalley, L. J. (2003). Population sex differences in IQ at age 11: The Scottish mental survey 1932. Intelligence, 31, 533-542.
Demack, S., Drew. D., & Grimsley, M. (2000). Minding the gap: ethnic, gender and social class differences in attainment at 16. Race, Ethnicity & Education, 3, 117- 143.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2002). Autumn Package 2002. Latest version available online at http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/performance/ap/ [Accessed 12 October, 2004).
Elwood, J. (1995).Undermining gender stereotypes: examination and coursework performance in the UK at 16. Assessment in Education, 2, (3) 283-303.
Feingold, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62, 61-84.