Political interactions and voter responses

0044 English OPEN
Tucker, Luc;
  • Subject: JA

This thesis investigates empirically the way in which agents in political bodies can influence their peers, as well as the ways in which voters respond to the behavior of legislators in their electoral choices. These relationships are fundamental in trying to comprehend... View more
  • References (10)

    Brunner, E., S. L. Ross, and E. Washington (2013). Does less income mean less representation? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy , 53-76.

    Eggers, A. C. and J. Hainmuller (2009). MPs for sale? Returns to office in postwar British politics. The American Political Science Review , 513-533.

    Glassman, M. E. and A. H. Wilhelm (2013). Congressional careers: Service tenure and patterns of member service, 1789-2013.

    Grimmer, J., E. Hersh, B. Feinstein, and D. Carpenter (2011). Are close elections random? Stanford University Working Papers.

    Grofman, B., R. Griffin, and G. Berry (1995). House members who become senators: Learning from a 'Natural experiment' in representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 513-529.

    Hainmueller, J. and H. L. Kern (2008). Incumbency as a source of spillover effects in mixed electoral systems: Evidence from a regression-discontinuity design. Electoral Studies, 213-227.

    Jenkins, J. A., M. H. Crespin, and J. L. Carson (2005). Parties as procedural coalitions in Congress: An examination of differing career tracks. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 365-389.

    Lee, D. S. (2008). Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. The regression discontinuity design: Theory and applications, 675-697.

    Lee, D. S., E. Moretti, and M. J. Butler (2004). Do voters affect or elect policies? Evidence from the U.S. House. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 807-859.

    Oswald, A. J. and S. Wu (2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 576-579.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark