publication . Article . Other literature type . 2017

Decision making in NICE single technological appraisals: How does NICE incorporate patient perspectives?

Hashem, Ferhana; Calnan, Michael W.; Brown, Patrick R.;
Open Access English
  • Published: 07 Jul 2017
Context: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has an explicit mandate to include Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in the appraisal of medicines to be available for funding on the NHS. NICE involves an appraisal committee who are required to take on board experiential evidence from patient experts alongside population-based evidence on clinical and cost-effectiveness when making a decision whether to fund a drug.\ud \ud Objective: This paper considers how NICE Single Technological Appraisal (STA) committees attempt to incorporate the views of patients in making decisions about funding medicines on the NHS.\ud \ud Methods: A prospective...
Medical Subject Headings: health care economics and organizations
free text keywords: decision-making, drug appraisals, NICE, patient experts, rationing, written and oral evidence, H, Original Research Paper, Original Research Papers, decision‐making, Project team, computer.programming_language, computer, Mandate, Nursing, Health care rationing, Excellence, media_common.quotation_subject, media_common, Patient participation, Medicine, business.industry, business, Documentary evidence, Population, education.field_of_study, education
Related Organizations
36 references, page 1 of 3

1. Abraham J. The pharmaceutical industry, the state, and the NHS. In: Gabe JCM, ed. The New Sociology of the Health Service. London: Routledge; 2009:99-120.

2. Harrison S, McDonald R. The Politics of Healthcare in Britain. SAGE Publications; 2008. of healthcare in britain&f=false. Accessed May 22, 2017.

3. Crinson I. The politics of regulation within the “Modernized” NHS: the case of beta interferon and the “cost-effective” treatment of multiple sclerosis. Crit Soc Policy. 2004;24:30-49.

4. Timmins N, Rawlins M, Appleby J. A terrible beauty. resize.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2017. [OpenAIRE]

5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013 Process, 2013. uk/process/pmg9/resources/guide-to-the-methods-of-technologyappraisal-2013-pdf-2007975843781. Accessed May 22, 2017.

6. Charles C, DeMaio S. Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993;18:881-904.

7. Jones IR, Berney L, Kelly M, et al. Is patient involvement possible when decisions involve scarce resources? A qualitative study of decision-making in primary care. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:93-102.

8. Légaré F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T, Packenham C, Tapp S, Burgers J. A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2009;4:30.

9. Boivin A, Lehoux P, Burgers J, Grol R. What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation. Milbank Q. 2014;92:319-350. [OpenAIRE]

10. Boivin A, Lehoux P, Lacombe R, Burgers J, Grol R. Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2014;9:24. [OpenAIRE]

11. Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, Herron-Marx S. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24:28-38.

12. Petsoulas C, Peckham S, Smiddy J, Wilson P. Primary care-led commissioning and public involvement in the English National Health Service. Lessons from the past. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015;16: 289-303. [OpenAIRE]

13. Staniszewska S. Patient and public involvement in health services and health research: a brief overview of evidence, policy and activity. J Res Nurs. 2009;14:295-298. [OpenAIRE]

14. Milewa T. Representation and legitimacy in health policy formulation at a national level: perspectives from a study of health technology eligibility procedures in the United Kingdom. Health Policy (New York). 2008;85:356-362.

15. Milewa T. Health technology adoption and the politics of governance in the UK. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:3102-3112. [OpenAIRE]

36 references, page 1 of 3
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue