A preliminary evaluation of using WebPA for online peer assessment of collaborative performance by groups of online distance learners

Article English OPEN
Murray, Jo-Anne; Boyd, Sharon;
(2015)
  • Publisher: AU Press

Collaborative assessment has well-recognised benefits in higher education and, in online distance learning, this type of assessment may be integral to collaborative e-learning and may have a strong influence on the student’s relationship with learning. While there are k... View more
  • References (15)
    15 references, page 1 of 2

    1. Blair, A. & McGinty, S. (2013). Feedback-dialogues: exploring the student perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38 (4), 466-476.

    2. Bourner, J., Hughes, M., & Bourner, T. (2001). First-year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (1), 19-39.

    3. Davies, W. M. (2009). Groupwork as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education, 58, 563-584.

    4. Dolmans, D., Wolfhagen, I., van der Vleuten, C., & Wijnen, W. (2001). Solving problems with groupwork in problem-based learning: Hold on to the philosophy. Medical Education, 35 (9), 884-889.

    5. Knowles, E., & Kerkman, D. (2007). An investigation of students' attitude and motivation toward online learning. Student Motivation, 2, 70-80.

    6. Loddington, S., Pond, K., Wilkinson, N., & Wilmot, P. (2009). A case study of the development of WebPA: An online peer-moderated marking tool. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (2), 329-341.

    7. Luxton-Reilly, A. (2009). A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment. Computer Science Education, 19 (4), 209-232.

    8. McConnell, D. (2002). The experience of collaborative assessment in e-learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 24 (1), 73-92.

    9. Nicol, D., & MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199-218.

    10. Ogden, J., & Lo, J. (2011). How meaningful are data from Likert scales? An evaluation of how ratings are made and the role of the response shift in the socially disadvantaged. International Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 350-361.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark