Incapacitation and Imprisonment: Prisoners’ Involvement in Community-based Crime.

Article English OPEN
Wood, Jane L. ; Williams, Graham Ross ; James, Mark (2010)

The impact of incapacitation on prisoners’ offending behavior is a neglected area of research. The aim of this study was to examine the extent and nature of prisoners’ involvement in community-based crime in the U.K. Participants were selected from nine prisons in the UK and consisted of 360 prisoners, 81 females and 279 males. Offenders were interviewed to assess levels and forms of involvement in community-based crime and perceptions of other prisoners’ involvement. Levels of prisonization and institutional and demographic characteristics were used to identify vulnerability to involvement in community-based crime. Twenty-five percent of the sample admitted personal involvement and 63% reported other prisoners’ involvement in a diverse range of crimes. Analyses revealed prisoners involved in community-based crime are likely to be young, male recidivists who hold prisonized attitudes. Prisoners who are white, prisonized and recidivist reported highest levels of other prisoners’ involvement in community-based crime. No age or gender differences delineated prisoners’ reports of others’ involvement. The results show that incarcerating offenders may not prevent their involvement in community-based offending. Discussion centres on the characteristics of involved prisoners and considers the implications of the results for rehabilitation and penal policy.
  • References (43)
    43 references, page 1 of 5

    Bobrowski, L. J. (1988). Collecting, Organizing and Reporting Street Gang Crime. Chicago: Chicago Police Department Special Functions Group.

    Buentello, L. S., Fong, R. S. & Vogel, R. E. (1991). Prison gang development: A theoretical model. The Prison Journal Vol. LXX1 (2): 3-9.

    released from prison under Home Secretary Michael Howard. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43 (4), 390-404.

    Camp, G. M. & Camp, C. G. (1985). Prison Gangs: Their extent, nature and impact on prisons. South Salem, NY: Criminal Justice Institute.

    Cavadino, M. & Dignan, J. (2002). The Penal System (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Clemmer, D. (1940). The Prison Community. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Crewe, B. (2005) Codes and conventions: the terms and donditions of contemporary inmate values. In Liebling, A. & Maruna, S. (Eds.) The Effects of Imprisonment, Cullompton: Willan.

    Crouch, B. M. & Marquart, J. W. (1989). An Appeal to Justice: Litigated reform of Texas prisons. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Prisons.

    DiIulio, J. J. & Piehl, A. M. (1991). Does prison pay? The stormy national debate over the cost effectiveness of imprisonment. The Brookings Review, Fall, 28-35.

    Drago, F., Galbrati, R. & Vertovs, P. (2007). The deterrent effects of prison: Evidence from a natural experiment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2912. Retrieved February 1, 2008, from Social Science Research Network website:

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Kent Academic Repository - IRUS-UK 0 76
Share - Bookmark