publication . Book . 2015

Technology, development and economic crisis: the Schumpeterian legacy

Evangelista, R.;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Jun 2015
  • Publisher: Birkbeck College, University of London
  • Country: United Kingdom
Abstract
This contribution highlights the complex, non-linear and potentially contradictory nature of the relationships between technological progress, economic growth and social development, in particular within the context of market based economies. It is also argued that a “positivistic bias” affects also the neo-Schumpeterian literature characterized by the dominance of a supply-side and micro-based view of the technology-economy relationships.
Subjects
free text keywords: man
Related Organizations
70 references, page 1 of 5

Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction, Econometrica, vol. 60, 323-351.

Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. 1998. Endogenous growth theory, Massachusetts. The MIT Press.

Archibugi, D. and Filippetti, A., 2011a. Is the crisis impairing convergence in innovation in Europe? Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49 no.6, 1153-1182. [OpenAIRE]

Archibugi, D. and Filippetti, A., 2011b. Innovation in times of crisis: National Systems of Innovation, structure, and demand, Research Policy, vol. 40 no. 2, 179-192. [OpenAIRE]

Arrow K., 1962. Economic Welfare and Allocation of Resources for Invention, in Nelson R., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, Princeton University Press. [OpenAIRE]

Basu, D. and Vasudevan, R. 2013. Technology, distribution and the rate of profit in the US economy: understanding the current crisis, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 37, 57-89.

Bellofiore, E. 2013. Two or three things I know about her‟: Europe in the global crisis and heterodox economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 37, 497-512. [OpenAIRE]

Bellofiore, E. and Halevi, J. 2011. The great recession and the third crisis in economic theory, in Brancaccio, E. and Fontana, R., The Global Economic Crisis, Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge.

Brancaccio, E. and Fontana, R. (eds) 2011. The Global Economic Crisis, Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge.

Bresnahan, T. 2010. General Purpose Technologies, in Hall, B.H. and Rosenberg N. (eds), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Amsterdam, North Holland.

Chaminade, C. and Edquist, C. 2006. From theory to practice. The use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy, in Hage, J. and De Meeus, M. (eds), Innovation, Learning and Institutions, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Courvisanos, J. 2009. Political aspects of innovation, Research Policy, vol. 38 no. 7, 1117- 1124. [OpenAIRE]

Courvisanos, J. 2012. Cycles, Crises and Innovation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

David, P.A. 1991. Computer and Dynamo: The Modern Productivity Paradox in a Nottoodistant Mirror, in OECD, Technology and Productivity, Paris, OECD.

David, P., Wright, G. 1999. General Purpose Technologies and Productivity Surges: Historical Reflections on the Future of the ICT Revolution, Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, University of Oxford, no. 31.

70 references, page 1 of 5
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue