The effects of different high-protein low-carbohydrates proprietary foods on blood sugar in healthy subjects

Article English OPEN
Lodi, Alessandra ; Karsten, Bettina ; Bosco, Gerardo ; Gómez-López, Manuel ; Brandão, Paula Paraguassú ; Bianco, Antonino ; Paoli, Antonio (2016)
  • Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1089/jmf.2016.0072
  • Subject: RC1200 | diabetes; diets; glycemic index
    mesheuropmc: digestive, oral, and skin physiology

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects on blood sugar concentrations through the calculation of the glycemic score (GS) of 10 different high-protein low-carbohydrates (CHOs) proprietary foods that are commonly used as meals during very low-CHO ketogenic diets or during low-CHO diets. Fourteen healthy females were tested for their glycemic response curve elicited by 1000 kJ of glucose three times within a 3-week period (one test each week) compared with one of 10 test foods once on separate days twice a week. After determining the GS of each food in each individual, the mean GS of each test food was calculated. All test foods, compared with glucose, produced a significantly lower glycemic response. The GS of all test food resulted in being lower than 25 and the difference between the mean glycemia after the intake of glucose (mean 122 ± 15 mg/dL) and after the intake of the sweet test foods (mean 89 ± 7 mg/dL) was 33 mg/dL (P < .001), whereas the difference between the mean glycemia after the intake of glucose and after the intake of savory test foods (mean 91 ± 8 mg/dL) was of 31 mg/dL (P < .001). Conclusions: The reformulation of ultraprocessed ready-to-consume foods in a low-CHO, high-protein version can produce a significantly lower glycemic response whilst maintaining the valued ready-to-use format and high palatability demanded by consumers. The low impact on postprandial glycemia and the nutritional characteristics of these proprietary foods makes them useful in both weight control management strategies and in the care management of diabetes.
  • References (35)
    35 references, page 1 of 4

    Nutr. Metab. 2015;66 Suppl 2:7-12.

    Kontis V, Mathers CD, Rehm J, et al.: Contribution of six risk factors to achieving the 25x25 non-communicable disease mortality reduction target: a modelling study. Lancet.

    2006;2(12):e188.

    Paoli A, Bianco A, Grimaldi KA, Lodi A, Bosco G: Long term successful weight loss with a combination biphasic ketogenic mediterranean diet and mediterranean diet maintenance protocol. Nutrients. 2013;5(12):5205-5217.

    Pan American Health Organization WHO: Consumption of ultra-processed food and drink products in Latin America: Trends, impact on obesity, and policy implications: PAHO Washington, DC; 2014.

    Monteiro CA, Moubarac JC, Cannon G, Ng SW, Popkin B: Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes. Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:21-28.

    Moubarac JC, Batal M, Martins AP, et al.: Processed and ultra-processed food products: consumption trends in Canada from 1938 to 2011. Can. J. Diet. Pract. Res. 2014;75(1):15- 21.

    Paoli A, Cenci L, Grimaldi KA: Effect of Ketogenic Mediterranean diet with phytoextracts and low carbohydrates/high-protein meals on weight, cardiovascular risk factors, body composition and diet compliance in Italian council employees. Nutr. J. 2011;10(1):112.

    Paoli A: Ketogenic Diet for Obesity: Friend or Foe? Int J Env Res Pub He. 2014;11(2):2092- 2107.

    Paoli A, Canato M, Toniolo L, et al.: The ketogenic diet: an underappreciated therapeutic option? La Clinica terapeutica. 2011;162(5):e145-e153.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark