Applying the interaction equivalency theorem to online courses in a large organization

Article English OPEN
Padilla Rodriguez, Brenda Cecilia ; Armellini, Alejandro (2014)
  • Publisher: The University of Alabama, the University of Texas at Tyler, and Miami University
  • Subject: LB1028.43 | HF5549.5.T7
    acm: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION

Finding effective ways of designing online courses is a priority for corporate organizations. The interaction equivalency theorem states that meaningful learning can be achieved as long as courses are designed with at least a high level of one of three types of interactions (learner-content, learner-teacher or learner-learner). This study aimed to establish whether the interaction equivalency theorem applies to online learning in the corporate sector. The research was conducted in a large Mexican commercial organization, and involved 147 learners (sales supervisors), 30 teachers (sales managers and directors) and 3 academic assistants (course designers, or Education support staff). Three courses of an existing Leadership Program (Situational Leadership, Empowering Beliefs and Effective Performance) were redesigned and developed to test three course designs, each emphasizing a different type of interaction (learner-content, learner-teacher or learner-learner). Data were collected through surveys (for diagnostic and evaluation purposes) and exams. All courses yielded high levels of effectiveness, in terms of satisfaction, learning, perceived readiness for knowledge transfer and return on expectations. This suggests that the interaction equivalency theorem not only applies in a business setting but might also include other indicators of course effectiveness, such as satisfaction, learning transfer and return on expectations. Further research is needed to explore the possible expansion of the theorem.
  • References (32)
    32 references, page 1 of 4

    Adams, J. (2008). Understanding the factors that limit the acceptability of online courses and degrees. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(4), 573-587.

    Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). Retrieved from:

    Armellini, A., Moseley, A., Hayes, N., Sweeney, D., Padilla Rodriguez, B. C., Conole, G., & Beard, J. (2012, September). An inclusive review of current uses of the institutional VLE staff and students at the University of Leicester. Paper presented at the Association for Learning Technology Conference, Manchester, United Kingdom.

    Becker, K. L., Newton, C. J., & Sawang, S. (2013). A learner perspective on barriers to elearning. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 53(2), 211-233.

    Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243-1289.

    Caliskan, H. (2009). Facilitators' perception of interactions in an online learning program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), 193-203.

    Chang, S.-H. H., & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learnercentered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 407-426.

    Cotton, D. R. E., & Gresty, K. A. (2007). The rhetoric and reality of e-learning: Using the think aloud method to evaluate an online resource. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(5), 583-600.

    Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65-79.

    DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S., & Zakaria, A. R. (2014). Interactions in online forums: A case study among first year undergraduate students. Frontiers in Education (FE), 2(1), 6-13.

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    NECTAR - IRUS-UK 0 118
Share - Bookmark