Selflessness is sexy: reported helping behaviour increases desirability of men and women as long-term sexual partners

Article English OPEN
Moore, David ; Wigby, Stuart ; English, Sinead ; Wong, Sonny ; Székely, Tamás ; Harrison, Freya (2013)
  • Publisher: BioMed Central
  • Journal: BMC evolutionary biology (issn: 1471-2148, vol: 13, pp: 182-182)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3851331, doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-182
  • Subject: Parental care | Research Article | Altruism | Sexual selection | HQ | Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics | Mate choice | Cooperation

Background:\ud Despite its short-term costs, behaviour that appears altruistic can increase an individual’s inclusive fitness by earning direct (selfish) and/or indirect (kin-selected) benefits. An evolved preference for other-regarding or helping behaviour in potential mates has been proposed as an additional mechanism by which these behaviours can yield direct fitness benefits in humans.\ud \ud Results:\ud We asked 32 heterosexual women and 35 heterosexual men to rate the attractiveness of members of the opposite sex in the presence and the absence of information about helping behaviours. Reports of helping behaviour were associated with a significant increase in the attractiveness of both men and women as potential long-term sexual partners. Altruism also increased the attractiveness of men as potential partners for short-term flings, but to a lesser extent than when the same men were being considered for long-term relationships. Altruism did not affect the attractiveness of women as partners for short-term flings.\ud \ud Conclusions:\ud Our results unite two important areas of evolutionary theory – social evolution and sexual selection – and extend the list of means by which helping behaviours, which appear at first glance to be costly to the actor, can in fact earn direct fitness benefits. Helping behaviours may be attractive because they signal ‘good genes’ and/or because they are perceived as a signal of likely provision of non-genetic benefits (e.g. parental care). Exactly why helping behaviours in a non-mating context might be attractive to potential mates, and whether they are honest signals of mate quality, remains to be elucidated.
  • References (57)
    57 references, page 1 of 6

    1. Hamilton WD: The genetical evolution of social behaviour I & II. J Theor Biol 1964, 7:1-52.

    2. Gardner A, Foster KR: The Evolution and Ecology of Cooperation - History and Concepts. In Ecology of Social Evolution. Edited by Korb J, Heinze J. Heidelberg: Springer; 2008:1-36.

    3. West SA, El Mouden C, Gardner A: Working Paper: Social evolution theory and its application to the evolution of cooperation in humans. http://www.zoo.ox.

    4. West SA, El Mouden C, Gardner A: Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evol Hum Behav 2011, 32:231-262.

    5. Farrelly D, Lazarus J, Roberts G: Altruists attract. Evol Psychol 2007, 5:313-329.

    6. Miller GF: Sexual selection for moral virtues. Q Rev Biol 2007, 82:97-125.

    7. Phillips T, Barnard C, Ferguson E, Reader T: Do humans prefer altruistic mates? Testing a link between sexual selection and altruism towards non-relatives. Brit J Psychol 2008, 99:555-572.

    8. Zahavi A, Zahavi A: The Handicap Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.

    9. Cockburn A: Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. Proc Biol Sci 2006, 273:1375-1383.

    10. Malcolm JR: Paternal Care in Canids. Amer Zool 1985, 25:853-856.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark