Seasonal Training-Load Quantification in Elite English Premier League Soccer Players

Article English OPEN
Malone, JJ ; Di Michele, R ; Morgans, R ; Burgess, D ; Morton, JP ; Drust, B

Purpose: To quantify the seasonal training load completed by professional soccer players of the English Premier League. Methods: Thirty players were sampled (using GPS, heart rate, and rating of perceived exertion [RPE]) during the daily training sessions of the 2011–12 preseason and in-season period. Preseason data were analyzed across 6 × 1-wk microcycles. In-season data were analyzed across 6 × 6-wk mesocycle blocks and 3 × 1-wk microcycles at start, midpoint, and end-time points. Data were also analyzed with respect to number of days before a match. Results: Typical daily training load (ie, total distance, high-speed distance, percent maximal heart rate [%HRmax], RPE load) did not differ during each week of the preseason phase. However, daily total distance covered was 1304 (95% CI 434–2174) m greater in the 1st mesocycle than in the 6th. %HRmax values were also greater (3.3%, 1.3–5.4%) in the 3rd mesocycle than in the first. Furthermore, training load was lower on the day before match (MD-1) than 2 (MD-2) to 5 (MD-5) d before a match, although no difference was apparent between these latter time points. Conclusions: The authors provide the 1st report of seasonal training load in elite soccer players and observed that periodization of training load was typically confined to MD-1 (regardless of mesocycle), whereas no differences were apparent during MD-2 to MD-5. Future studies should evaluate whether this loading and periodization are facilitative of optimal training adaptations and match-day performance.
  • References (31)
    31 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Impellizzeri FM, Rampinini E, Marcora SM. Physiological assessment of aerobic training in soccer. J. Sports Sci. 2005;23:583-592.

    2. Booth FW, Thompson DB. Molecular and cellular adaptation of muscle in response to exercise: Perspectives of various models. Physiol Rev. 1991;71:541-585.

    3. Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2:92-98.

    4. Coutts AJ, Rampinini E, Marcora SM, et al. Heart rate and blood lactate correlates of perceived exertion during small-sided soccer games. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12:79-84.

    5. Kelly DM, Drust B. The effect of pitch dimensions on heart rate responses and technical demands of small-sided soccer games in elite players. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12:475-479.

    6. Casamichana D, Castellano J. Time-motion, heart rate, perceptual and motor behaviour demands in small-sides soccer games: effects of pitch size. J Sports Sci. 2010;28:1615- 1623.

    7. Castellano J, Casamichana D. Differences in the number of accelerations between smallsided games and friendly matches in soccer. J Sports Sci Med. 2013;12:209-210.

    8. Gaudino P, Alberti G, Iaia FM. Estimated metabolic and mechanical demands during different small-sided games in elite soccer players. Hum Mov Sci. 2014; 23:123-133.

    9. Owen AL, Wong DP, Dunlop G, et al. High intensity training and salivary immunoglobulin-A responses in professional top-level soccer players: effect of training intensity. J Strength Cond Res. In press.

    10. Wrigley R, Drust B, Stratton G, et al. Quantification of the typical weekly in-season training load in elite junior soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2012;30:1573-1580.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    444
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    LJMU Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 444
Share - Bookmark