Comparison of stethoscope bell and diaphragm, and of stethoscope tube length, for clinical blood pressure measurement

Article English OPEN
Liu, Chengyu ; Griffiths, Clive ; Murray, Alan ; Zheng, Dingchang (2016)
  • Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  • Journal: Blood Pressure Monitoring, volume 21, issue 3, pages 178-183 (issn: 1359-5237, eissn: 1473-5725)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC4864738, doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000175
  • Subject: Korotkoff sound | blood pressure | bell and diaphragm | Devices and Technology | stethoscope characteristic | stethoscope tube length

OBJECTIVE\ud \ud This study investigated the effect of stethoscope side and tube length on auscultatory blood pressure (BP) measurement.\ud \ud METHODS\ud \ud Thirty-two healthy participants were studied. For each participant, four measurements with different combinations of stethoscope characteristics (bell or diaphragm side, standard or short tube length) were each recorded at two repeat sessions, and eight Korotkoff sound recordings were played twice on separate days to one experienced listener to determine the systolic and diastolic BPs (SBP and DBP). Analysis of variance was carried out to study the measurement repeatability between the two repeat sessions and between the two BP determinations on separate days, as well as the effects of stethoscope side and tube length.\ud \ud RESULTS\ud \ud There was no significant paired difference between the repeat sessions and between the repeat determinations for both SBP and DBP (all P-values>0.10, except the repeat session for SBP using short tube and diaphragm). The key result was that there was a small but significantly higher DBP on using the bell in comparison with the diaphragm (0.66 mmHg, P=0.007), and a significantly higher SBP on using the short tube in comparison with the standard length (0.77 mmHg, P=0.008).\ud \ud CONCLUSION\ud \ud This study shows that stethoscope characteristics have only a small, although statistically significant, influence on clinical BP measurement. Although this helps understand the measurement technique and resolves questions in the published literature, the influence is not clinically significant.
  • References (32)
    32 references, page 1 of 4

    1 Netea RT, Lenders JW, Smits P, Thien T. Both body and arm position significantly influence blood pressure measurement. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17:459-462.

    2 Beevers G, Lip GY, O'Brien E. ABC of hypertension: blood pressure measurement. Part II-conventional sphygmomanometry: technique of auscultatory blood pressure measurement. BMJ 2001; 322:1043-1047.

    3 Pan F, Zheng D, He P, Murray A. Does the position or contact pressure of the stethoscope make any difference to clinical blood pressure measurements: an observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93:e301.

    4 Drzewiecki GM, Melbin J, Noordergraaf A. The Korotkoff sound. Ann Biomed Eng 1989; 17:325-359.

    5 Welsby PD, Parry G, Smith D. The stethoscope: some preliminary investigations. Postgrad Med J 2003; 79:695-698.

    6 Abella M, Formolo J, Penney DG. Comparison of the acoustic properties of six popular stethoscopes. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91 (4 Pt 1):2224-2228.

    7 Campbell IW. MacLeod's clinical examination. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.

    8 Turner R, Blackwood R. Lecture notes on clinical skills. Edinburgh: Blackwell Science; 1997.

    9 Swash M. Hutchison's clinical methods. Edinburgh: WB Saunders; 2002.

    10 Coviello Jessica S. Auscultation skills - breath and heart sounds. Pennsylvania: Springhouse Corporation; 1999.

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available