Development of DYNAMIX Policy Mixes - Deliverable 4.2, revised version, of the DYNAMIX project

Book English OPEN
Ekvall, T. ; Elander, M. ; Umpfenbach, K. ; Hirschnitz-Garbers, M. ; Hudson, C. ; Wunder, S. ; Nesbit, M. ; Keenleyside, C. ; Mazza, L. ; Russi, D. ; Tucker, G. ; Underwood, E. ; Withana, S. ; Bicket, M. ; Vanner, R. ; Kong, M.A. ; Tan, A. ; Bigano, A. ; Eboli, F. ; Gaska, J. ; Sniegocki, A. (2016)
  • Publisher: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
  • Subject: UOWABE

This report documents the development of the initial dynamic policy mixes that were developed for assessment in the DYNAMIX project. The policy mixes were designed within three different policy areas: overarching policy, land-use and food, and metals and other materials. The policy areas were selected to address absolute decoupling in general and, specifically, the DYNAMIX targets related to the use of virgin metals, the use of arable land and freshwater, the input of the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus, and emissions of greenhouse gases. Each policy mix was developed within a separate author team, using a common methodological framework that utilize previous findings in the project. Specific drivers and barriers for resource use and resource efficiency are discussed in each policy area. Specific policy objectives and targets are also discussed before the actual policy mix is presented. Each policy mix includes a set of key instruments, which can be embedded in a wider set of supporting and complementary policy instruments. All key instruments are described in the report through responses to a set of predefined questions. The overarching mix includes a broad variety of key instruments. The land-use policy mix emphasizes five instruments to improve food production through, for example, revisions of already existing policy documents. It also includes three instruments to influence the food consumption and food waste. The policy mix on metals and other materials primarily aims at reducing the use of virgin metals through increased recycling, increased material efficiency and environmentally justified material substitution. To avoid simply shifting of burdens, it includes several instruments of an overarching character.
  • References (117)
    117 references, page 1 of 12

    Delforge Pierre and Horowitz Noah. 2013. Energy Consumption of New Generation Game Consoles in the EU - Key Findings, URL: [31/07/2014]

    Deloitte. 2013. Responsible tax: Sustainable tax strategy, URL:

    Demailly, Damien, Lucas Chancel, Henri Waiman, and Céline Guivarch. 2013. “A PostGrowth Society for the 21st Century - Does Prosperity Have to Wait for the Return of Economic Growth?” Studies N°08/2013. Paris: IDDRI.

    Devetter, F.-X., Rousseau, S. 2011. Working hours and sustainable development. Review of Social Economy 69, 333-355.

    Dise, N.B. 2011. Nitrogen as a threat to European terrestrial diversity, in M A Sutton, C M Howard, J W Erisman, G Billen, A Bleeker, P Grennfelt, H van Grinsven, & B Grizzetti (eds) The European Nitrogen Assessment, Chapter 20. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Druckman, A., Buck, I., Hayward, B. and Jackson, T. 2012. Time, gender and carbon: A study of the carbon implications of British adults' use of time. Ecological Economics 84: 153-163.

    EEA. 2009. Water Resources across Europe. Confronting Water Scarcity and Drought. EEA Report No 2/2009, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.

    EEA. 2010a. The European Environment State and Outlook 2010: Land Use. State of the Environment Report, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.

    EEA. 2010b. EU 2010 Biodiversity Baseline. EEA Technical Report No 12/2010, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.

    EEA. 2011a. The European environment - state and outlook 2010: assessment of global megatrends. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark