Student perceptions of exodontia competency assessment in a UK dental school

Article English OPEN
Redford, Rhys ; Durkan, C. ; Sivarajasingam, Vaseekaran ; Emanuel, Charlotte (2018)

Introduction\ud \ud Modern medical and dental training has migrated from assessing only the quantity of procedures performed to a combined assessment of both competency and quantity. This study explores student perceptions of competency assessment in exodontia at a UK dental school.\ud \ud \ud Materials and Methods\ud \ud Anonymous questionnaires were distributed to dental students in years three, four and five at the School of Dentistry, Cardiff University (n=149). Responses consisted of dichotomous tick boxes and 5-point Likert scales, with thematic analysis of free-text responses. Discrete variables were analysed using simple descriptive statistics. Recurring themes were identified from the responses.\ud \ud \ud Results\ud \ud A total of 129 questionnaires were returned (response rate 87%). Feedback from students indicated that they felt well prepared to undertake the competency assessment, agreeing that year three is the most appropriate year to assess competency (69%; n=86). In 50% of cases (n=65), the clinical supervisor was not present for the duration of the assessment. The undergraduate student body would like further teaching in the use of elevators (89%; n=114).\ud \ud \ud Conclusion\ud \ud The competency assessment was deemed fit for purpose by the undergraduate student body. Further developments in the areas of clinical supervision and teaching on the use of elevators were considered and recommendations made to the School of Dentistry, Cardiff University. The current oral surgery course incorporates some of the recommendations.
  • References (25)
    25 references, page 1 of 3

    14. Honey J, Lynch CG, Burke FM, Gilmour ASM. Ready for practice? A study of confidence levels of final year dental students at Cardiff University and University College Cork. Eur J Dent Educ 2011: 15: 98-103.

    15. Chambers DW. Competencies: A new view of becoming a dentist. J Dent Educ 1994: 58: 342-345.

    16. Tennant M, Scriva J. Clinical assessment in dental education: A new method. Aust Dent J 2000: 45: 125-130.

    17. Prescott LE, Norcini JJ, McKinlay P, Rennie JS. Facing the challenges of competency-based assessment of postgraduate dental training: Longitudinal Evaluation of Performance (LEP). Med Educ 2002: 36: 92-97.

    18. Stelzle F, Farhoumand D, Neukam F, et al. Implementation and validation of an extraction course using mannequin models for undergraduate dental students. Acta Odontol Scand 2011: 69: 80-87.

    19. Zijlstra-Shaw S, Robinson PG, Roberts T, et al. Assessing professionalism within dental education; the need for a definition. Eur J Dent Educ 2012: 16: 128-136.

    20. Grantcharov TP, Reznick RK. Teaching rounds: teaching procedural skills. Br Med J 2008: 336: 1129.

    21. Leitch J, Soldani F. An investigation of the acceptability of undergraduate supervision by Senior House Officers and General Professional Trainees. Br Dent J 2005: 198: 771-775.

    22. Macluskey M, Durham J, Bell A, et al. A national survey of UK final year students' opinion of undergraduate oral surgery teaching. Eur J Dent Educ 2012: 16: 205-212.

    23. Sambell K, McDowell L, Brown S. But is it fair?: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Stud Educ Eval 1997: 23: 349-371.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Online Research @ Cardiff - IRUS-UK 0 19
Share - Bookmark