Development of a technical assistance framework for building organizational capacity of health programs in resource-limited settings

Article English OPEN
Reyes, E Michael ; Sharma, Anjali ; Thomas, Kate K ; Kuehn, Chuck ; Morales, José Rafael (2014)
  • Publisher: BioMed Central
  • Journal: BMC Health Services Research, volume 14 (eissn: 1472-6963)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-399, pmc: PMC4175633
  • Subject: ART | Research Article | wa_110 | wa_30 | wc_503 | Sustainability | wa_525 | wa_105 | Health Policy | HIV | Technical assistance | Health system strengthening | PEPFAR | Capacity building

Background\ud \ud Little information exists on the technical assistance needs of local indigenous organizations charged with managing HIV care and treatment programs funded by the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). This paper describes the methods used to adapt the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) framework, which has successfully strengthened HIV primary care services in the US, into one that could strengthen the capacity of local partners to deliver priority health programs in resource-constrained settings by identifying their specific technical assistance needs.\ud \ud Methods\ud \ud Qualitative methods and inductive reasoning approaches were used to conceptualize and adapt the new Clinical Assessment for Systems Strengthening (ClASS) framework. Stakeholder interviews, comparisons of existing assessment tools, and a pilot test helped determine the overall ClASS framework for use in low-resource settings. The framework was further refined one year post-ClASS implementation.\ud \ud Results\ud \ud Stakeholder interviews, assessment of existing tools, a pilot process and the one-year post- implementation assessment informed the adaptation of the ClASS framework for assessing and strengthening technical and managerial capacities of health programs at three levels: international partner, local indigenous partner, and local partner treatment facility. The PCAT focus on organizational strengths and systems strengthening was retained and implemented in the ClASS framework and approach. A modular format was chosen to allow the use of administrative, fiscal and clinical modules in any combination and to insert new modules as needed by programs. The pilot led to refined pre-visit planning, informed review team composition, increased visit duration, and restructured modules. A web-based toolkit was developed to capture three years of experiential learning; this kit can also be used for independent implementation of the ClASS framework.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud \ud A systematic adaptation process has produced a qualitative framework that can inform implementation strategies in support of country led HIV care and treatment programs. The framework, as a well-received iterative process focused on technical assistance, may have broader utility in other global programs.
  • References (33)
    33 references, page 1 of 4

    1. El-Sadr WM, Holmes CB, Mugyenyi P, Thirumurthy H, Ellerbrock T, Ferris R, Sanne I, Asiimwe A, Hirnschall G, Nkambule RN, Stabinsky L, Affrunti M, Teaside C, Zulu I, Whiteside A: Scale-up of HIV treatment through PEPFAR: a historic public health achievement. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2012, 60(Suppl 3):S96-S104.

    2. Fiscal Year 2012 Country Operational Plan (COP) Guidance. http://www.

    3. Using science to save lives: Latest PEPFAR results. documents/organization/187770.pdf.

    4. Fiscal Year 2013 Country Operational Plan (COP) Guidance. http://www.

    5. Government Accountability Office (US: President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief: Efforts to Align Programs With Partner countries' HIV/AIDS Strategies and Promote Partner Country Ownership. Washington D.C: GAO; 2010.

    6. Institute of Medicine Committee on the Ryan White CARE Act: Measuring What Matters: Allocation, Planning, and Quality Assessment for the Ryan White CARE Act. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2004.

    7. Clinical Assessment for Systems Strengthening.

    8. A Successful Framework for Assuring the Quality and Sustainability of US Government-Supported HIV Care and Treatment Programs in Resource-Limited Settings.

    9. Green J, Thorogood N: Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: Sage; 2004.

    10. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ: Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res 2007, 42(4):1758-1772.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark