Competing tensions and demands pervade our work lives. Accumulating research examines organizational and leadership approaches to leveraging these tensions. But what about individuals within firms? Although early paradox theory built upon micro-level insights from psych... View more
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazency, J., & Herron, M. 1996. Assesing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1154-1184.
Andrews, F. M., & Farris, G. F. 1972. Time pressure and performance of scientists and engineers: A five-year panel study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8(2): 185-200.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. 2009. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4): 696-717.
Ashforth, B., Rogers, K. M., Pratt, M. G., & Pradies, C. 2014. Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach. Academy of Management Review, 25(5): 1453-1478.
Baer, M. 2012. Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5): 1102-1119.
Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. 2006. The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4): 963-970.
Bartunek, J. 1988. The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. Paradox and transformation: Towards a theory of change in organization and management: 137-162. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Bechtoldt, M.N., De Dreu, C.K.W., Nijstad, B.A., &Choi, H-S. 2010. Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99 (4): 622-637.
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. 2009. A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3): 305-337.