Design and stabilisation of a high area iron molybdate surface for the selective oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde

Article English OPEN
Chapman, Stephanie ; Brookes, Catherine ; Bowker, Michael ; Gibson, Emma K. ; Wells, Peter (2016)

The performance of Mo-enriched, bulk ferric molybdate, employed commercially for the industrially important reaction of the selective oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde, is limited by a low surface area, typically 5-8 m(2) g(-1). Recent advances in the understanding of the iron molybdate catalyst have focused on the study of MoOx@Fe2O3 (MoOx shell, Fe2O3 core) systems, where only a few overlayers of Mo are present on the surface. This method of preparing MoOx@Fe2O3 catalysts was shown to support an iron molybdate surface of higher surface area than the industrially-favoured bulk phase. In this research, a MoOx@Fe2O3 catalyst of even higher surface area was stabilised by modifying a haematite support containing 5 wt% Al dopant. The addition of Al was an important factor for stabilising the haematite surface area and resulted in an iron molybdate surface area of ?35 m(2) g(-1), around a 5 fold increase on the bulk catalyst. XPS confirmed Mo surface-enrichment, whilst Mo XANES resolved an amorphous MoOx surface monolayer supported on a sublayer of Fe2(MoO4)3 that became increasingly extensive with initial Mo surface loading. The high surface area MoOx@Fe2O3 catalyst proved amenable to bulk characterisation techniques; contributions from Fe2(MoO4)3 were detectable by Raman, XAFS, ATR-IR and XRD spectroscopies. The temperature-programmed pulsed flow reaction of methanol showed that this novel, high surface area catalyst (3ML-HSA) outperformed the undoped analogue (3ML-ISA), and a peak yield of 94% formaldehyde was obtained at ?40 °C below that for the bulk Fe2(MoO4)3 phase. This work demonstrates how core-shell, multi-component oxides offer new routes for improving catalytic performance and understanding catalytic activity.
  • References (47)
    47 references, page 1 of 5

    1 W. J. Linn and A. W. Sleight, J. Catal., 1976, 41, 134-139.

    2 J. L. Callahan, R. K. Grasselli, E. C. Milberger and H. A. Strecker, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 1970, 9, 134-142.

    3 S. Kowatsch, Formaldehyde, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.

    4 G. W. Keulks, J. Catal., 1970, 19, 232-235.

    5 U. Chowdhry, A. Ferretti, L. E. Firment, C. J. Machiels, F. Ohuchi, A. W. Sleight and R. H. Staley, Appl. Surf. Sci., 1984, 19, 360-372.

    6 M. Bowker, R. Holroyd, A. Elliott, P. Morrall, A. Alouche, C. Entwistle and A. Toerncrona, Catal. Lett., 2002, 83, 165-176.

    7 M. Bowker, C. Brookes, A. F. Carley, M. P. House, M. Kosif, G. Sankar, I. Wawata, P. P. Wells and P. Yaseneva, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 12056-12067.

    8 C. Brookes, P. P. Wells, G. Cibin, N. Dimitratos, W. Jones, D. J. Morgan and M. Bowker, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 243-250.

    9 C. Brookes, P. P. Wells, N. Dimitratos, W. Jones, E. K. Gibson, D. J. Morgan, G. Cibin, C. Nicklin, D. Mora-Fonz, D. O. Scanlon, C. R. A. Catlow and M. Bowker, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 26155-26161.

    10 Y. Huang, L. Cong, J. Yu, P. Eloy and P. Ruiz, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2009, 302, 48-53.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark