Assessing the accuracy of the WISC-IV seven-subtest short form and the child and adolescent intellectual disability screening questionnaire in identifying intellectual disability in children

Article English OPEN
McKenzie, Karen ; Murray, Aja Louise ; Murray, Kara ; Murray, George (2014)

Little research has been conducted into the accuracy of abbreviated assessments in identifying children and young people with an intellectual disability (ID). The present study compared two such methods in a clinical population of individuals with (n = 106) and without (n = 170) ID: a 7-subtest short form of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales for Children--fourth edition (WISC-IV) proposed by Crawford and colleagues and the Child and Adolescent Intellectual Disability Screening Questionnaire (CAIDS-Q). Both the CAIDS-Q and the WISC-IV short form had high and comparable levels of predicting group classification (88% and 91% correct classification, respectively). Both methods would appear to offer clinicians and researchers an efficient and accurate means of identifying those who are likely to have ID. The WISC-IV short form was slightly more accurate, but the CAIDS-Q may offer the advantages of being shorter to administer and having no requirement for the user to have a particular qualification or training.
  • References (14)
    14 references, page 1 of 2

    American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, text revision (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Bodin, D., Pardini, D.A., Burns, T.G., & Stevens, A.B. (2009). Higher order factor structure of the WISC-IV in a clinical neuropsychological sample. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 417-424.

    British Psychological Society (2001). Learning disability: Definitions and contexts. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.

    British Psychological Society. (2003). Issues in screening. Leicester: British Psychological Society

    Charman, T., Baird, G., Simonoff, E., Loucas, T., Chandler, S., Meldrum, D., & Pickles, A. (2007). Efficacy of three screening instruments in the identification of autisticspectrum disorders. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 554-559.

    Chen, H. & Zhu, J. (2008). Factor invariance between genders of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth edition. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 260- 266.

    Chen, H. & Zhu, J. (2012). Measurement invariance of WISC-IV across normative and clinical samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 161-166.

    Crawford, J.R., Anderson, V., Rankin, P.M., & MacDonald, J. (2010). An index-based shortform of the WISC-IV with accompanying analysis of the reliability and abnormality of differences. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 235-258.

    Facon, B., Magis, D., Nuchadee, M., & De Boeck, P. (2011). Do Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices function in the same way in typical and clinical populations? Insights from the intellectual disability field. Intelligence, 39, 281-291.

    Garland, T., (2005). Test review: The Weschsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). Journal of Occupational Psychology, Employment and Disability, 7(2), 130-135

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Northumbria Research Link - IRUS-UK 0 133
Share - Bookmark