Test-retest reliability of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire

Article English OPEN
Grafton, Kate; Foster, Nadine; Wright, Christine;
(2005)
  • Publisher: Wolters Kluwer

<p>Objectives: No previous study has adequately demonstrated the test-retest reliability of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, yet it is increasingly being used as a measure of pain. This study evaluates the test-retest reliability in patients with osteoarthritis... View more
  • References (8)

    47. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86: 420-8.

    48. Chinn S. Repeatability and method comparison. Thorax. 1991; 46: 454-6.

    49. Bland M, An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Vol. 3rd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000.

    50. British Standards Institution. Precision of test methods. Part 1: Guide for determination and reproducibility far a standard test method. . BS5497, part1. British Standards Institution. 1979: 1-22.

    51. Jensen MP, McFarland A. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1993; 55: 195-203.

    52. Papageorgiou AC, Badley EM. The quality of pain in arthritis: the words patients use to describe overall pain and pain in individual joints at rest and on movement. J Rheumatol. 1989; 16: 106-12.

    53. Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, et al. The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Ageing. 1995; 24: 120-5.

    54. Roche PA. Memory for pain: a physiotherapy issue. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 1993; 9: 87-90.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark