Explosion and the normativity of logic

Article English OPEN
Steinberger, Florian (2016)

Logic has traditionally been construed as a normative discipline; it sets forth standards of correct reasoning. Explosion is a valid principle of classical logic. It states that an inconsistent set of propositions entails any proposition whatsoever. However, ordinary agents presumably do -- occasionally, at least -- have inconsistent belief sets. Yet it is false that such agents may, let alone ought to, believe any proposition they please. Therefore, our logic should not recognize explosion as a logical law. Call this the 'normative argument against explosion'. Arguments of this type play -- implicitly or explicitly -- a central role in motivating paraconsistent logics. Branden Fitelson (2008), in a throwaway remark, has conjectured that there is no plausible 'bridge principle' articulating the normative link between logic and reasoning capable of supporting such arguments. This paper offers a critical evaluation of Fitelson's conjecture, and hence of normative arguments for paraconsistency and the conceptions of logic's normative status on which they repose. It is argued that Fitelson’s conjecture turns out to be correct: normative arguments for paraconsistency probably fail.
  • References (21)
    21 references, page 1 of 3

    Anderson, Alan R., and Nuel Belnap 1975: Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Belnap, Nuel 1977: 'A Useful Four-Valued Logic'. In Michael Dunn and George Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, pp. 8-37. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Broome, John 1999: 'Normative Requirements'. Ratio, 12, pp. 398-419.

    -- 2013: Rationality Through Reasoning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

    Bykvist, Kirster, and Anandi Hattiangadi 2007: 'Does Thought Imply Ought?' Analysis, 67, pp. 277-85.

    Chisholm, Roderick 1963: 'Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic'. Analysis, 24, pp. 33-6.

    Chrisman, Matthew 2008: 'Ought to Believe'. Journal of Philosophy, 105, pp. 346-70.

    Christensen, David 2004: Putting Logic in its Place: Formal Constraints on Rational Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Easwaran, Kenny, and Branden Fitelson 2015: 'Accuracy, Coherence, and Evidence'. In Tamar Szabo´ Gendler and John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Vol. 5, pp. 61-96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Feldman, Richard 2000: 'The Ethics of Belief '. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60, pp. 667-95.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Birkbeck Institutional Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 16
Share - Bookmark