Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages

Article English OPEN
Di Gregorio, M ; Nurrochmat, DR ; Paavola, J ; Sari, IM ; Fatorelli, L ; Pramova, E ; Locatelli, B ; Brockhaus, M ; Kusumadewi, SD (2017)
  • Publisher: Elsevier
  • Journal: Environmental Science & Policy, volume 67, pages 35-43 (issn: 1462-9011)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.004
  • Subject: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law | Geography, Planning and Development

This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) internal climate policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of internal policy coherence. External policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries internalize a strong mandate on internal and external climate policy coherence and find ways to coordinate policy action effectively.
  • References (50)
    50 references, page 1 of 5

    Adelle, C., Russel, D., 2013. Climate policy integration: a case of Deja vu? Environ. Policy Gov. 23, 1-12.

    Boer, R., Perdinan, 2008. Adaptation to climate variability and climate change: its socio-economic aspect. EEPSEA Conference on Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation, And Policy in South East Asia With A Focus on Economics, SocioEconomics and Institutional Aspects. Economi and Environmental Program for Southeast Asia, Bali.

    Campbell, B.M., 2009. Beyond Copenhagen: REDD plus, agriculture, adaptation strategies and poverty. Glob. Environ. Chang 19, 397-399.

    Collier, U., 2002. EU energy policy in a changing climate. In: Lenschow, A. (Ed.), Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe. Earthscan, London.

    Dalal-Clayton, B., Bass, S., 2009. The Challenges of Environmental Mainstreaming: Experience of Integrating Environment into Development Institutions and Decisions, Environmental Governance No. 3. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London.

    Denton, F., Wilbanks, T.J., Abeysinghe, A.C., Burton, I., Gao, Q., Lemos, M.C., Masui, T., O'Brien, K.L., Warner, K., 2014. Climate-resilient pathways: adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. In: Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D. J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P.R., White, L.L. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, pp. 1101-1131.

    Duguma, L.A., Wambugu, S.W., Minang, P.A., van Noordwijk, M., 2014. A systematic analysis of enabling conditions for synergy between climate change mitigation and adaptation measures in developing countries. Environ. Sci. Policy 42, 138- 148.

    Dunlop, T., Corbera, E., 2016. Incentivizing REDD+: How developing countries are laying the groundwork for benefit-sharing. Environ. Sci. Policy 63, 44-54.

    Franck, T.M., 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Giessen, L., 2013. Reviewing the main characteristics of the international forest regime complex and partial explanations for its fragmentation. Int. For. Rev. 11, 60-70.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available