The EU race directive: its symbolic value - its only value?

Article English OPEN
Howard, Erica (2004)
  • Publisher: AB Academic Publishers

Legislation against racial discrimination makes, it is argued, a clcar statement against racism in all its forms and hence has symbolic value. This is expressed in\ud different ways, for example: a declaration of firm opposition to racism; the sending out or a clear political signal regarding the commitment to the fight against racism; a powerrul symbol and a statement of intent. This Article will argue that the European Union's Race directive had, at the time of its adoption, significant symbolic value because it made a clear and unequivical statement to\ud the Union's citizens, to its Member States and to the wider world, that the Union was committed to the elimination of racisrn and racial discrimination. The plans for enlargement of the European Union, with a number of States joining in 2004, added to the value of the statement: it signalled to these new Member States that the Union expects thcm to combat racism and racial or ethnic discrimination and to promote and adopt effective measures against such discr-imination in line with the Race Directive, as this has become part of the Acquis Comnunautaire, the body of law that: must be adopted by all States wishing to join. But does the Race Directive today, after the deadline for its implelnziltation has passed, still have any symbolic value?
  • References (59)
    59 references, page 1 of 6

    Allott, A. (1980) f i e Liluits of' LCII,I)C, hapter G , 161-237. Butterworths; London.

    Banton. M. (1994) Discr-i177ir~urionO, pei~University Press.

    Barnard. C. (1999) Article 13: Through the Looking Glass of Union Citizenship. In Legai Issrte.r of tlze A1n~rerdi1~7iTtllr~earj, (O'Keeffc, D. and Twolney, P. (eds.) 375-95. Hart Publishjng; Oxrord.

    Bell, M. and Waddington, L. (1996)The 1996 Intcrgoverl~i~ientaClonference and the Prospects ol' a Non-Discriininatiol Treaty Article. Ind~utrialLaii, .Jourrzctl 25. 4, 320,-36.

    Bell, M. (1999) The New Article 13 EC: A Sound Basis for EU AntiDiscrimination Law? Mc1a.si1.icJ71Jotlr-~znJof E~.cropcm?rn7d Ca17~~~urniLiailiev, 6. 5-24.

    Bell, M. (2000) Equality and Diversity: Anti-Discriminatioi Law after Amsterdam. In Sociul L U I 'aInd Policy ir? 017 evoll!i~~Qglrol~enrz Union (Shaw, J . (ed.), 157-71. Hart Publishing; Oxfol-d.

    Bell, M. (2001) Meeting the Challenge? A Colnpalison between the EU Racial Equality Directiveand the Starting Line. In The Slarlirzg Line .and file Iilc~orporntiorrqf flze Racicrl Eqztnlily Dir.ccrii?ei?zlo1l7c I\mtiorzal Lnivs of (he Eli Aden?her. States crrzcl Acccssinjz Stales, Chopin, I. and Niessen, J. (eds.) 12-54. Belmont Press; Brussels/London.

    Bell. M. (2002)a Combating Racism Through European Laws: A Comparison of the Racial Equality Directive and Protocol 12. In Cor7zbaling Rncic~alfzdEthnic Discrirnin.aliorz. T~rkingthe E~~ropeaLnegislative .4gench F~irther.( C l - ~ o ~ iIn. , and Niessen, J. (eds.), 7-34. Migration Policy Group and CRE;. Brussels] London.

    Bell, M. (2002)b Arzti-Discri17zi~zc2tjonLaw clnd tlzr E~lropea~zUrziott. Oxford University Press.

    Bindman, G. (1996) When will Europe Act Against Racism? Ezrrol~enizHzrr~~rzn Riglzts Law Revielv 2, 143-9.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Middlesex University Research Repository - IRUS-UK 0 33
Share - Bookmark