Lexicality and frequency in specific language impairment: accuracy and error data from two nonword repetition tests

Article English OPEN
Jones, G ; Tamburelli, M ; Watson, SE ; Gobet, F ; Pine, JM (2010)

Purpose: Deficits in phonological working memory and deficits in phonological processing have both been considered potential explanatory factors in Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Manipulations of the lexicality and phonotactic frequency of nonwords enable contrasting predictions to be derived from these hypotheses. Method: 18 typically developing (TD) children and 18 children with SLI completed an assessment battery that included tests of language ability, non-verbal intelligence, and two nonword repetition tests that varied in lexicality and frequency. Results: Repetition accuracy showed that children with SLI were unimpaired for short and simple high lexicality nonwords, whereas clear impairments were shown for all low lexicality nonwords. For low lexicality nonwords, greater repetition accuracy was seen for nonwords constructed from high over low frequency phoneme sequences. Children with SLI made the same proportion of errors that substituted a nonsense syllable for a lexical item as TD children, and this was stable across nonword length. Conclusions: The data show support for a phonological processing deficit in children with SLI, where long-term lexical and sub-lexical phonological knowledge mediate the interpretation of nonwords. However, the data also suggest that while phonological processing may provide a key explanation of SLI, a full account is likely to be multi-faceted.
  • References (17)
    17 references, page 1 of 2

    Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Bowey, J. A. (1996). On the association between phonological memory and receptive vocabulary in five-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 44-78.

    Bowey, J. A. (2001). Nonword repetition and young children‟s receptive vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 441-469.

    Bowey, J. A. (2006). Clarifying the phonological processing account of nonword repetition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 548-552.

    Briscoe, J., Bishop, D. V. M., & Norbury, C. F. (2001). Phonological processing, language, and literacy: A comparison of children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and those with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 329-340.

    Brown, G. D. A., & Hulme, C. (1995). Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 594-621.

    Chiat, S. (2001). Mapping theories of developmental language impairment: Premises, predictions and evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 113-142.

    Chiat, S. (2006). The developmental trajectory of nonword repetition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 552-556.

    Coady, J. A., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Young children‟s sensitivity to probabilistic phonotactics in the developing lexicon. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 183-213.

    Conti-Ramsden, G. (2003). Processing and linguistic markers in young children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1029-1037.

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Institutional Repository - IRUS-UK 0 77
Share - Bookmark