Who are we? language and impartiality in BBC radio journalism

Article English OPEN
Mitchell, Philip; Stewart, James;

This article scrutinises the usage of the words “we”, “us” and “our” by BBC radio journalists when reporting and discussing news and current affairs. By analysing reports and discussions on the “flagship” Radio 4 Today, a daily news programme whose centrality to politic... View more
  • References (50)
    50 references, page 1 of 5

    Alber, Jennifer, Daniel O'Connell and Sabine Kowal. 2002. 'Personal Perspective in TV News Interviews.' Pragmatics 12 (2): 257-271.

    Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities. 2nd ed. London: Verso.

    BBC. 2015. Editorial Guidelines. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/page/guidelinesimpartiality-consensus-campaigns-scrutiny/

    Bell, Allan. 1991. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Berry, Mike. 2012. 'The Today Programme and the Banking Crisis.' Journalism 14 (2): 253-270.

    Bucholz, Mary. 2000. 'The Politics of Transcription.' Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1439-1465.

    Bull, Peter and Anita Fetzer. 2006. 'Who Are We And Who Are You? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews.' Text and Talk 26 (1): 3-37.

    Clayman, Stephen E. 1992. 'Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: the Case of News-Interview Discourse.' In Talk at Work, edited by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 163-198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Clayman, Stephen E. 2002. 'Tribune of the People: Maintaining the Legitimacy of Aggressive Journalism.' Media, Culture and Society 24 (2): 197-216.

    Clayman, Stephen E. and Heritage, John. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark