Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies

Article English OPEN
Pornari, Chrysoula ; Wood, Jane L. (2010)

This study investigated the relationship between cognitive mechanisms, applied by people to rationalize and justify harmful acts, and engagement in traditional peer and cyber aggression among school children. We examined the contribution of moral disengagement (MD), hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies, and we further explored the individual contribution of each MD mechanism. Our aim was to identify shared and unique cognitive factors of the two forms of aggression. Three hundred and thirty-nine secondary school children completed self-report measures that assessed MD, hostile attribution bias, outcome expectancies, and their roles and involvement in traditional and cyber aggression. We found that the MD total score positively related to both forms of peer-directed aggression. Furthermore, traditional peer aggression positively related to children's moral justification, euphemistic language, displacement of responsibility and outcome expectancies, and negatively associated with hostile attribution bias. Moral justification also related positively to cyber aggression. Cyber aggression and cyber victimization were associated with high levels of traditional peer aggression and victimization, respectively. The results suggest that MD is a common feature of both traditional and cyber peer aggression, but it seems that traditional forms of aggression demand a higher level of rationalization or justification. Moreover, the data suggest that the expectation of positive outcomes from harmful behavior facilitates engagement in traditional peer aggression. The differential contribution of specific cognitive mechanisms indicates the need for future research to elaborate on the current findings, in order to advance theory and inform existing and future school interventions tackling aggression and bullying.
  • References (46)
    46 references, page 1 of 5

    Bentley, K. M., & Li, A. (1995). Bully and victim problems in elementary schools and Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 11, 153 165.

    Berger, K. S. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 90-126.

    Berkowitz, L. (1989). Situational influences on aggression. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 356-360). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Björkqvist, K., Ekman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1982). Bullying and victims: Their ego picture, ideal ego picture and normative ego picture. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 307-313.

    Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Österman, K. (1992). The Direct and Indirect Aggression Scales. Vasa, Finland: Abo Akademi University, Department of Social Sciences.

    Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1-45.

    Bosworth, K., Espelage, D. L., & Simon, T. R. (1999). Factors associated with bullying behavior in middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 341-362.

    Camodeca, M., Goossens, F. A., Terwogt, M. M, & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among school-age children: Stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development, 11, 332 345.

    Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15, 68 76.

    Dodge, K. A., Murphy, R. R., & Bachsbaum, K. (1984). The assessment of intention-cue detection skills in children: Implications for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 163-173.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    151
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Kent Academic Repository - IRUS-UK 0 151
Share - Bookmark