Sustainable workplaces and building user comfort and satisfaction

Article English OPEN
Smith, Andrew James ; Pitt, Michael (2011)
  • Publisher: Emerald

Purpose – This paper aims to examine the role of sustainable buildings in providing healthy workplaces in physical and perceptual terms. \ud \ud Design/methodology/approach – The paper takes the form of a literature review, considering the history of sustainable development in the built environment and its rationale, then widening the scope to consider sustainable, healthy and productive workplaces. \ud \ud Findings – Sustainable construction has focused on environmental sustainability but this may have contributed to improved health, satisfaction and wellbeing amongst building users. Sick building syndrome and poor indoor air are contributory factors to ill health and reduced productivity but this paper suggests that sustainable building practices will reduce these effects, improving the quality of buildings for their occupants. \ud \ud Practical implications – This paper argues that building performance measures need to take account of people factors such as employee perceptions and also that the design of workplaces should be regarded as a strategy for productivity enhancement. Management issues should be considered in the design of workplaces. The paper concludes that further research is required into the role of sustainable construction in providing healthy buildings. \ud \ud Originality/value – The paper makes practical suggestions for corporate real estate and facilities management teams as well as those involved in the design of the buildings. Additionally, it opens suggested avenues for further academic research.
  • References (9)

    Alevantis, L., Levin, H. (2011). “Materials-related IAQ.” ASHRAE Journal, March 2011, pp. 86-88.

    Baird, G., Oosterhoff, H. (2008) “Users' perceptions of health in sustainable buildings worldwide.” Healthy and Creative Facilities, Proceedings of the CIB W70 Conference in Facilities Management, Edinburgh, UK, 16th - 18th June 2008, pp. 649 - 656.

    Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B., Leiter, M.P., Taris, T.W. (2008) “Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology.” Work & Stress, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 187 - 200.

    Thomas-Mobley, L., Roper, K.O., Oberle, R. (2005), "A proactive assessment of sick building syndrome", Facilities, Vol. 23 No.1/2, pp.6-15.

    Tong, D., Leaman, A. (1993) “Sick building syndrome: Strategies and tactics for managers.” Facilities, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 19 - 23.

    Veitch, J., Gifford, R. (1996) “Choice, perceived control and performance decrements in the physical environment.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 269 - 276.

    Warnock, A.C. (2007) “An overview of integrating instruments to achieve sustainable construction and buildings.” Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 427-441.

    WCED (1987) “Our Common Future.” Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. [online]. Available at: Wells, M. (2000) “Office clutter or meaningful personal displays: The role of office personalization in employee and organizational well-being.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 239 - 255.

    Williams, P. (1998) “Air-conditioned environments: System faults affecting occupant productivity and well-being in Australian buildings,” The Cutting Edge 1998. RICS Research.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Central Lancashire Online Knowledge - IRUS-UK 0 566
Share - Bookmark