The implementation of an environmental\ud management system in the not-for-profit sector

Article English OPEN
White, G. ; Lomax, M. ; Parry, G. (2014)
  • Publisher: Emerald

Purpose\ud This paper examines the implementation of the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) in a non-profit, small to medium sized enterprise (SME) in the UK.\ud Methodology\ud A four year Participatory Action Research study is made upon Knowledge Transfer Partnerships between the University of the West of England and the Royal Bath and West Society. \ud Findings\ud Through the adoption of EMAS the organisation was able to identify operational improvements as well as make significant efforts to improve its environmental performance, reducing its carbon footprint by 30 tCO₂e per annum and gaining new business.\ud Research Limitations\ud The study is made upon a single not for profit organisation in the UK.\ud Practical Implications\ud It presents the costs, benefits and challenges that the organisation faced. Techniques that were used to successfully manage the EMS development are also discussed.\ud The investigation identifies deficiencies in the materials that are provided to support companies that are seeking EMAS certification. To improve the uptake of these environmental management systems and assist companies in their successful pursuit of ISO14001 and EMAS, this supporting documentation requires enhancement.\ud Originality\ud There has been relatively little empirical research around the development and benefits of organisational environmental management systems (EMS). Even less has focussed upon the specific constraints and opportunities that face non-profit organisations when implementing EMAS. This paper addresses this gap, identifying its costs and tangible benefits.
  • References (9)

    Akzo Nobel, “Akzo Nobel, Ciba first for EMAS”. Chemical Week, 1995, 157(9), p41.

    Barrett, H., Balloun, J., L., Weinstein, A. “The Impact of Creativity on Performance in NonProfits”. International Journal of Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Marketing, 2005, 10, p213-223.

    American Sociological Review, 1958, 23(6), p652-660.

    Benz, M. “Not for the Profit, But for the Satisfaction? - Evidence on Worker Well-Being in Non-Profit Firms”. KYKLOS, 2005, 58(2), p155-176.

    Boyatzis, R., E. Transforming Qualitative Information. Sage Publications, UK, 1998.

    Bryman, A. Social Research Methods, 3rd Ed. OUP Oxford, UK, 2008.

    Cairns, B., Harris, M., Hutchison, R., Tricker, M. “Improving Performance? The Adoption and Implementation of Quality Systems in UK Nonprofits”. Nonprofit Leadership & Management, 2005, 16(2), p135-151.

    DEFRA, Attitudes and Knowledge Relating to Biodiversity and the Natural Environment 2007-2011, 2011. Retrieved May 5, 2011, from DEFRA, Businesses, 2012. Retrieved August 31st, 2012, from Susman, G., I., Evered, R., D. “As Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research”.

    Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, p582-603.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark