Neural correlates of emotion word processing: the interaction between emotional valence and arousal

Doctoral thesis English OPEN
Citron, Francesca M. M. (2011)
  • Subject: QZ

Emotion is characterised by two-dimensions: emotional valence\ud describes the extent to which an emotion is positive or negative, and\ud arousal represents its intensity. Emotional content of verbal material\ud affects cognitive processing, although research on word recognition has\ud only recently taken emotion into account, primarily focusing on valence,\ud while neglecting arousal.\ud \ud The present work aimed to disentangle the effects of valence and\ud arousal during a lexical decision task, using reaction times (RTs), event-related\ud potentials (ERPs) and BOLD responses in an event-related fMRI\ud design. These methods were chosen to determine when affective\ud features have an effect, and which neural systems are involved.\ud \ud The material for three experiments was based on a word corpus\ud created by collecting ratings for emotional and lexico-semantic\ud features. A first and novel finding was that arousal interacted with\ud valence. Specifically, lexical decision times were slower for high-arousal\ud positive stimuli (PH) and low-arousal negative ones (NL) compared to\ud low-arousal positive (PL) and high arousal negative (NH) stimuli.\ud \ud ERPs also showed an interaction between 200-300 ms on the early\ud posterior negativity (EPN), a component which is sensitive to emotional\ud stimuli. At this processing stage people access their mental lexicon. Its\ud amplitude was greater for PH and NL words, suggesting a higher\ud processing load for conflicting stimuli. Positive valence and low arousal\ud elicit an approach schema, whereas negative valence and high arousal\ud elicit an avoidance schema (Robinson, Storbeck, Meier & Kirkeby, 2004).\ud \ud BOLD responses showed a similar interaction in the insula\ud bilaterally, with increased activation for PH and NL words. This region is\ud associated with integration of information on visceral states with\ud higher-order cognitive and emotional processing, suggesting higher\ud difficulty in integrating conflicting stimuli.\ud \ud Taken together, these studies indicate that emotion affects word\ud processing during lexical access, and models of word recognition need\ud to take into account both valence and arousal.
  • References (88)
    88 references, page 1 of 9

    Aaron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170- 177.

    Algom, D., Chajut, E., & Lev, S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133, 323-338.

    Altarriba, J., & Bauer, L. M. (2004). The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389-410.

    Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529-550.

    Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283- 316.

    Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 mono-syllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29, 639-647.

    Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier.

    Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchinson, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445-459.

    Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., & Paradiso, M. A. (2006). Neuroscience: Exploring the brain (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Bernat, E., Bunce, S., & Shevrin, H. (2001). Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42, 11-34.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark