The Semantic Web: Apotheosis of annotation, but what are its semantics?\ud

Article English OPEN
Wilks, Y. (2008)
  • Publisher: IEEE Computer Soc

This article discusses what kind of entity the proposed Semantic Web (SW) is, principally by reference to the relationship of natural language structure to knowledge representation (KR). There are three distinct views on this issue. The first is that the SW is basically a renaming of the traditional AI KR task, with all its problems and challenges. The second view is that the SW will be, at a minimum, the World Wide Web with its constituent documents annotated so as to yield their content, or meaning structure, more directly. This view makes natural language processing central as the procedural bridge from texts to KR, usually via some form of automated information extraction. The third view is that the SW is about trusted databases as the foundation of a system of Web processes and services. There's also a fourth view, which is much more difficult to define and discuss: If the SW just keeps moving as an engineering development and is lucky, then real problems won't arise. This article is part of a special issue called Semantic Web Update.
  • References (47)
    47 references, page 1 of 5

    1. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila, “The Semantic Web,” Scientific American , May 2001, pp. 34-43.

    2. L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, Oxford Univ. Press, 1953.

    3. G. Hirst, “Context as a Spurious Concept,” Proc. Conf. Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, 2000, pp. 273-287.

    4. Y. Wilks and M. den Besten, “Digital Technologies Shaping E-research,” to be published in World Wide Science: Promises, Threats, and Realities, Oxford Univ. Press.

    5. P. Patel-Schneider, P.J. Hayes, and I. Horrocks, OWL Web Ontology: Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax, W3C recommendation, Feb. 2004, www.w3.org/ TR/owl-semantics.

    6. I. Horrocks, “Description Logics in Ontology Applications,” Proc. KI/Tableaux 2005, 2005, www.gusconstan.com/AI/ DescriptionLogics.htm.

    7. J. McCarthy and P. Hayes, “Some Philosophical Problems from the Point of View of Articfiial Intelligence,” Machine Intelligence 4, D. Michie, ed., Edinburgh Univ. Press, 1969, pp. 463-502.

    8. J. McCarthy, Formalizing Common Sense: Papers by John McCarthy, Ablex, 1990.

    9. P.J. Hayes, “The Naive Physics Manifesto,” Expert Systems in the Micro-Electronic Age, D. Michie, ed., Edinburgh Univ. Press, 1979, pp. 242-270.

    10. D. Bobrow and T. Winograd, “An Overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language,” Cognitive Science, vol. 1, no. 1, 1977, pp. 3-46.

  • Metrics
    0
    views in OpenAIRE
    0
    views in local repository
    35
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 35
Share - Bookmark