Modulation of frontal effective connectivity during speech

Article English OPEN
Holland, Rachel ; Leff, Alex P. ; Penny, William D. ; Rothwell, John C. ; Crinion, Jenny (2016)
  • Publisher: Elsevier BV
  • Journal: NeuroImage, volume 140, pages 126-133 (issn: 1053-8119, eissn: 1095-9572)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC5033642, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.037
  • Subject: fMRI — functional magnetic resonance imaging | DCM — Dynamic Causal Modelling, IFS — inferior frontal sulcus, Speech production, VPM — ventral premotor cortex, fMRI — functional magnetic resonance imaging, tDCS — transcranial direct current stimulation | P1 | VPM — ventral premotor cortex | tDCS — transcranial direct current stimulation | DCM — Dynamic Causal Modelling | Speech production | Cognitive Neuroscience | Article | IFS — inferior frontal sulcus | Neurology

Noninvasive neurostimulation methods such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can elicit long-lasting, polarity-dependent changes in neocortical excitability. In a previous concurrent tDCS-fMRI study of overt picture naming, we reported significant behavioural and regionally specific neural facilitation effects in left inferior frontal cortex (IFC) with anodal tDCS applied to left frontal cortex (Holland et al., 2011). Although distributed connectivity effects of anodal tDCS have been modelled at rest, the mechanism by which ‘on-line’ tDCS may modulate neuronal connectivity during a task-state remains unclear. Here, we used Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) to determine: (i) how neural connectivity within the frontal speech network is modulated during anodal tDCS; and, (ii) how individual variability in behavioural response to anodal tDCS relates to changes in effective connectivity strength. Results showed that compared to sham, anodal tDCS elicited stronger feedback from inferior frontal sulcus (IFS) to ventral premotor (VPM) accompanied by weaker self-connections within VPM, consistent with processes of neuronal adaptation. During anodal tDCS individual variability in the feedforward connection strength from IFS to VPM positively correlated with the degree of facilitation in naming behaviour. These results provide an essential step towards understanding the mechanism of ‘online’ tDCS paired with a cognitive task. They also identify left IFS as a ‘top-down’ hub and driver for speech change.
  • References (50)
    50 references, page 1 of 5

    Antal, A., Varga, E.T., Kincses, T.Z., Nitsche, M.A., Paulus, W., 2004. Oscillatory brain activity and transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. Neuroreport 15 (8), 1307-1310.

    Baker, J.M., Rorden, C., Fridriksson, J., 2010. Using transcranial direct-current stimulation to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke 41 (6), 1229-1236.

    Bastos, A.M., Briggs, F., Alitto, H.J., Mangun, G.R., Usrey, W.M., 2014. Simultaneous recordings from the primary visual cortex and lateral geniculate nucleus reveal rhythmic interactions and a cortical source for gamma-band oscillations. J. Neurosci. 34 (22), 7639-7644.

    Bastos, A.M., Vezoli, J., Bosman, C.A., Schoffelen, J.M., Oostenveld, R., Dowdall, J.R., De Weerd, P., Kennedy, H., Fries, P., 2015. Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels. Neuron 85 (2), 390-401.

    Bauer, M., Stenner, M.P., Friston, K.J., Dolan, R.J., 2014. Attentional modulation of alpha/ beta and gamma oscillations reflect functionally distinct processes. J. Neurosci. 34 (48), 16117-16125.

    Boggio, P.S., Rigonatti, S.P., Ribeiro, R.B., Myczkowski, M.L., Nitsche, M.A., Pascual-Leone, A., Fregni, F., 2008. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 11 (2), 249-254.

    Bollimunta, A., Mo, J., Schroeder, C.E., Ding, M., 2011. Neuronal mechanisms and attentional modulation of corticothalamic alpha oscillations. J. Neurosci. 31 (13), 4935-4943.

    Bosman, C.A., Schoffelen, J.M., Brunet, N., Oostenveld, R., Bastos, A.M., Womelsdorf, T., Rubehn, B., Stieglitz, T., De Weerd, P., Fries, P., 2012. Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas. Neuron 75 (5), 875-888.

    Brown, E.C., Brune, M., 2012. The role of prediction in social neuroscience. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 147.

    Buchel, C., Coull, J.T., Friston, K.J., 1999. The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. Science 283 (5407), 1538-1541.

  • Related Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available