The impact of self-monitoring in chronic illness on healthcare utilisation: a systematic review of reviews

Article English OPEN
McBain, Hayley ; Shipley, Michael ; Newman, Stanton (2015)
  • Publisher: BioMed Central
  • Journal: BMC Health Services Research (vol: 15)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1221-5, pmc: PMC4683734
  • Subject: Health Policy | Research Article | Healthcare utilization | Hospitalization | Chronic illness | Complex interventions | Meta-analysis | Systematic review | Self-monitoring | R1

Background Self-management interventions have been found to reduce healthcare utilisation in people with long-term conditions, but further work is needed to identify which components of these interventions are most effective. Self-monitoring is one such component and is associated with significant clinical benefits. The aim of this systematic review of reviews is to assess the impact of self-monitoring interventions on healthcare utilisation across a range of chronic illnesses. Methods An overview of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Multiple databases were searched (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, AMED, EBM and HMIC) along with the reference lists of included reviews. A narrative synthesis was performed, accompanied by calculation of the Corrected Cover Area to understand the impact of overlapping primary research papers. Results A total of 17 systematic reviews and meta-analyses across three chronic conditions, heart failure, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, were included. Self-monitoring was associated with significant reductions in hospitalisation and re-admissions to hospital. Conclusions Self-monitoring has the potential to reduce the pressure placed on secondary care services, but this may lead to increase in services elsewhere in the system. Further work is needed to determine how these findings affect healthcare costs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1221-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
  • References (56)
    56 references, page 1 of 6

    1. Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:177-87.

    2. Panagioti M, Richardson G, Small N, Murray E, Rogers A, Kennedy A, et al. Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:356.

    3. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Br M J. 2008;337:a1655.

    4. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis JJ, Eccles MP. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81-95.

    5. Creer TL. Self-management. In: Baum A, Newman S, Weinman J, West R, McManus C, editors. Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 255-8.

    6. Song M, Lipman TH. Concept analysis: self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:1700-10.

    7. Wilde MH, Garvin S. A concept analysis of self-monitoring. J Adv Nurs. 2007; 57:339-50.

    8. Sarol Jr JR, Nicodemus Jr NA, Tan KM, Grava MB. Self-monitoring of blood glucose as part of a multi-component therapy among non-insulin requiring type 2 diabetes patients: A meta-analysis (1966-2004). Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21:173-83.

    9. Welschen LM, Bloemendal E, Nijpels G, Dekker JM, Heine RJ, Stalman WA, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1510-7.

    10. Allemann S, Houriet C, Diem P, Stettler C. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:2903-13.

  • Related Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark