Genome-Wide Analysis of Transposon and Retroviral Insertions Reveals Preferential Integrations in Regions of DNA Flexibility

Article English OPEN
Vrljicak, Pavle ; Tao, Shijie ; Varshney, Gaurav K. ; Quach, Helen Ngoc Bao ; Joshi, Adita ; LaFave, Matthew C. ; Burgess, Shawn M. ; Sampath, Karuna (2016)
  • Publisher: Genetics Society of America
  • Journal: G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics, volume 6, issue 4, pages 805-817 (issn: 2160-1836, eissn: 2160-1836)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC4825651, doi: 10.1534/g3.115.026849, doi: 10.1534/g3.115.026849
  • Subject: retrovirus | gene targeting | QH426 | Investigations | functional genomics | transposon | vertebrate genomes | mouse | QH426-470 | Genetics | genome-wide analysis | Tol2 | Ac/Ds | MMLV | zebrafish | integrations | genome engineering | ES cells

DNA transposons and retroviruses are important transgenic tools for genome engineering. An important consideration affecting the choice of transgenic vector is their insertion site preferences. Previous large-scale analyses of Ds transposon integration sites in plants were done on the basis of reporter gene expression or germline transmission, making it difficult to discern vertebrate integration preferences. Here, we compare over 1300 Ds transposon integration sites in zebrafish, with Tol2 transposon and retroviral integration sites. Genome-wide analysis shows that Ds integration sites in the presence or absence of marker selection are remarkably similar and distributed throughout the genome. No strict motif was found, but a preference for structural features in the target DNA associated with DNA flexibility (Twist, Tilt, Rise, Roll, Shift and Slide) was observed. Remarkably, this feature is also found in transposon and retroviral integrations in maize and mouse cells. Our findings show that structural features influence integration of heterologous DNA in genomes, and have implications for targeted genome engineering.\ud \ud
  • References (54)
    54 references, page 1 of 6

    Aday, A. W., L. J. Zhu, A. Lakshmanan, J. Wang and N. D. Lawson, 2011 Identification of cis regulatory features in the embryonic zebrafish genome through large-scale profiling of H3K4me1 and H3K4me3 binding sites. Dev Biol 357: 450-462.

    Aiuti, A., S. Slavin, M. Aker, F. Ficara, S. Deola et al., 2002 Correction of ADASCID by stem cell gene therapy combined with nonmyeloablative conditioning. Science 296: 2410-2413.

    Amsterdam, A., G. K. Varshney and S. M. Burgess, 2011 Retroviral-mediated Insertional Mutagenesis in Zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol 104: 59-82.

    Bourque, G., B. Leong, V. B. Vega, X. Chen, Y. L. Lee et al., 2008 Evolution of the mammalian transcription factor binding repertoire via transposable elements. Genome Res 18: 1752-1762.

    Calvi, B. R., T. J. Hong, S. D. Findley and W. M. Gelbart, 1991 Evidence for a common evolutionary origin of inverted repeat transposons in Drosophila and plants: hobo, Activator, and Tam3. Cell 66: 465-471.

    Cavazzana-Calvo, M., S. Hacein-Bey, G. de Saint Basile, F. Gross, E. Yvon et al., 2000 Gene therapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease. Science 288: 669-672.

    Chadwick, B. P., 2008 DXZ4 chromatin adopts an opposing conformation to that of the surrounding chromosome and acquires a novel inactive X-specific role involving CTCF and antisense transcripts. Genome Res 18: 1259-1269.

    Cheng, L. D., X. Y. Jiang, Y. M. Tian, J. Chen and S. M. Zou, 2014 The goldfish hAT-family transposon Tgf2 is capable of autonomous excision in zebrafish embryos. Gene 536: 74-78.

    Crooks, G. E., G. Hon, J. M. Chandonia and S. E. Brenner, 2004 WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14: 1188-1190.

    Davie, K., J. Jacobs, M. Atkins, D. Potier, V. Christiaens et al., 2015 Discovery of transcription factors and regulatory regions driving in vivo tumor development by ATAC-seq and FAIRE-seq open chromatin profiling. PLoS Genet 11: e1004994.

  • Related Research Results (3)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark