Exploring Risk Perception and Attitudes to Miscarriage and Congenital Anomaly in Rural Western Kenya

Article English OPEN
Dellicour, Stephanie ; Desai, Meghna ; Mason, Linda ; Odidi, Beatrice ; Aol, George ; Phillips-Howard, Penelope A. ; Laserson, Kayla F. ; ter Kuile, Feiko O. (2013)
  • Publisher: Public Library of Science
  • Journal: PLoS ONE, volume 8, issue 11 (eissn: 1932-6203)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080551, pmc: PMC3827434
  • Subject: qs_675 | Research Article | wq_225 | wa_30 | wa_395 | wq_240 | wa_310

Background\ud Understanding the socio-cultural context and perceptions of adverse pregnancy outcomes is important for informing the best approaches for public health programs. This article describes the perceptions, beliefs and health-seeking behaviours of women from rural western Kenya regarding congenital anomalies and miscarriages.\ud \ud Methods\ud Ten focus group discussions (FGDs) were undertaken in a rural district in western Kenya in September 2010. The FGDs included separate groups consisting of adult women of childbearing age, adolescent girls, recently pregnant women, traditional birth attendants and mothers of children with a birth defect. Participants were selected purposively. A deductive thematic framework approach using the questions from the FGD guides was used to analyse the transcripts.\ud \ud Results\ud There was substantial overlap between perceived causes of miscarriages and congenital anomalies and these were broadly categorized into two groups: biomedical and cultural. The biomedical causes included medications, illnesses, physical and emotional stresses, as well as hereditary causes. Cultural beliefs mostly related to the breaking of a taboo or not following cultural norms. Mothers were often stigmatised and blamed following miscarriage, or the birth of a child with a congenital anomaly. Often, women did not seek care following miscarriage unless there was a complication. Most reported that children with a congenital anomaly were neglected either because of lack of knowledge of where care could be sought or because these children brought shame to the family and were hidden from society.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud The local explanatory model of miscarriage and congenital anomalies covered many perceived causes within biomedical and cultural beliefs. Some of these fuelled stigmatisation and blame of the mother. Understanding of these beliefs, improving access to information about the possible causes of adverse outcomes, and greater collaboration between traditional healers and healthcare providers may help to reduce stigma and increase access to formal healthcare providers.
  • References (27)
    27 references, page 1 of 3

    1. Dellicour S, Tatem AJ, Guerra CA, Snow RW, ter Kuile FO (2010) Quantifying the number of pregnancies at risk of malaria in 2007: a demographic study. PLOS Med 7: e1000221. PubMed: 20126256.

    2. Stanton C, Lawn JE, Rahman H, Wilczynska-Ketende K, Hill K (2006) Stillbirth rates: delivering estimates in 190 countries. Lancet 367: 1487-1494. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68586-3. PubMed: 16679161.

    3. Rahman M, DaVanzo J, Razzaque A (2010) The role of pregnancy outcomes in the maternal mortality rates of two areas in Matlab, Bangladesh. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 36: 170-177. doi: 10.1363/3617010.

    4. Reardon DC, Ney PG, Scheuren F, Cougle J, Coleman PK et al. (2002) Deaths associated with pregnancy outcome: a record linkage study of low income women. South Med J 95: 834-841. doi: 10.1097/00007611-200208000-00010. PubMed: 12190217.

    5. Howson C, Christianson A, Modell B (2008) Controlling Birth Defects: Reducing the Hidden Toll of Dying and Disabled Children in LowerIncome Countries. Washington, DC.

    6. Baird PA (1999) Prenatal screening and the reduction of birth defects in populations. Community Genet 2: 9-17. doi:10.1159/000016177. PubMed: 15178956.

    7. Edmonds LD, James LM (1993) Temporal trends in the birth prevalence of selected congenital malformations in the Birth Defects Monitoring Program/Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, 1979-1989. Teratology 48: 647-649. doi:10.1002/tera. 1420480606. PubMed: 8115973.

    8. Bale JR, Stoll BJ, Lucas AO (2003) Reducing Birth Defects: Meeting the Challenge in the Developing World. National Academy of Sciences.

    9. Penchaszadeh VB (2002) Preventing congenital anomalies in developing countries. Community Genet 5: 61-69. doi: 10.1159/000064632. PubMed: 14960901.

    10. Landrine H, Klonoff EA (1994) Cultural diversity in causal attributions for illness: the role of the supernatural. J Behav Med 17: 181-193. doi: 10.1007/BF01858104. PubMed: 8035451.

  • Related Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark