A Systematic Review of Studies Measuring and Reporting Hearing Aid Usage in Older Adults since 1999: A Descriptive Summary of Measurement Tools

Article English OPEN
Perez, Elvira ; Edmonds, Barrie A. (2012)
  • Publisher: Public Library of Science
  • Journal: PLoS ONE, volume 7, issue 3 (issn: 1932-6203, eissn: 1932-6203)
  • Related identifiers: pmc: PMC3313982, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031831
  • Subject: Research Article | Biology | Neuroscience | Clinical Research Design | Medicine | Otology | Q | R | Science | Sensory Systems | Otorhinolaryngology | Non-Clinical Medicine
    mesheuropmc: otorhinolaryngologic diseases

Objective: A systematic review was conducted to identify and quality assess how studies published since 1999 have\ud measured and reported the usage of hearing aids in older adults. The relationship between usage and other dimensions of hearing aid outcome, age and hearing loss are summarised.\ud \ud Data sources: Articles were identified through systematic searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, The University of Nottingham\ud Online Catalogue, Web of Science and through reference checking. Study eligibility criteria: (1) participants aged fifty years or over with sensori-neural hearing loss, (2) provision of an air conduction hearing aid, (3) inclusion of hearing aid usage measure(s) and (4) published between 1999 and 2011.\ud \ud Results: Of the initial 1933 papers obtained from the searches, a total of 64 were found eligible for review and were quality assessed on six dimensions: study design, choice of outcome instruments, level of reporting (usage, age, and audiometry) and cross validation of usage measures. Five papers were rated as being of high quality (scoring 10–12), 35 papers were rated as being of moderate quality (scoring 7–9), 22 as low quality (scoring 4–6) and two as very low quality (scoring 0–2). Fifteen different methods were identified for assessing the usage of hearing aids.\ud \ud Conclusions: Generally, the usage data reviewed was not well specified. There was a lack of consistency and robustness in\ud the way that usage of hearing aids was assessed and categorised. There is a need for more standardised level of reporting of hearing aid usage data to further understand the relationship between usage and hearing aid outcomes.
  • References (64)
    64 references, page 1 of 7

    1. Davis AC, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulus I (2007) Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technol Assess 11: 3-5.

    2. Cacciatore F, Napoli C, Abete P, Marciano E, Triassi M, et al. (1999) Quality of life determinants and hearing function in an elderly population: OsservatorioGeriatricoCampano Study Group. Gerontology 45: 323-328.

    3. Lopez-Torres J, Boix C, Tellez J, Lopez MA, del Campo JM, et al. (2009) Functional status of elderly people with hearing loss. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 49: 88-92.

    4. Action for Hearing Loss (2011) Facts and figures on deafness and tinnitus. Taking Action on Hearing Loss in the 21st century, June 2011.

    5. Schneider J, Gopinath B, Karpa M, McMahon C, Rochtchina E, et al. (2010) Hearing loss impacts on the use of community and informal supports. Age Ageing 39: 458-464.

    6. Dalton D, Cruickshanks K, Klein B, Klein R, Wiley T, et al. (2003) The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist 43: 661-668.

    7. Kramer S, Goverts S, Dreschler W, Boymans M, Festen J (2002) International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): results from The Netherlands. Int J Audiol 41: 36-41.

    8. Goggins S, Day J (2009) Pilot study: Efficacy of recalling adult hearing-aid users for reassessment after three years within a publicly-funded audiology service. Int J Audiol 48: 204-210.

    9. Uriarte M, Denzin L, Dunstan A, Sellars J, Hickson L (2005) Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire: Australian data. J Am Acad Audiol 16: 383-402.

    10. Roup C, Noe C (2009) Hearing aid outcomes for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. Am J Audiol 18: 45-52.

  • Related Research Results (3)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark