The effects of adapting to complex motions: position invariance and tuning to spiral motions

Article English OPEN
Snowden, Robert Jefferson ; Milne, Alan B. (1996)

Recent neurophysiological evidence (e.g., Graziano, Andersen, & Snowden, 1994) suggested that some cells in the medial superior temporal area (MST) of the Old World monkey are sensitive to complex motions such as those brought about by a surface moving in depth or rotating. Two important findings were that these cells show position invariance (i.e., their preferred stimulus does not change across the receptive field), and that some cells were selective for “spiralling” stimuli rather than pure rotations or pure expansion/contractions. This paper attempts to provide evidence for similar processes in the human visual system by employing the technique of selective adaptation. We have simulated surfaces undergoing a motion in depth (div) or a rotation (curl), but have removed any cues that are not related to global motion. After adapting to a large pattern undergoing, say, an expansion, an aftereffect that contained an element of contraction could be elicited by placing small test patterns anywhere in the adapted area. This suggests that the global structure of the motion field must have been encoded as well as the local motion. Likewise thresholds for detecting motions similar to the adapting motion were elevated across the adapted area, while thresholds for other motions were not. Hence the effects of adaptation are both selective and show a degree of position invariance. Adaptation to pure div or pure curl stimuli was compared with adaptation to spiralling stimuli. Threshold elevation was always selective for the adapting motion and the shape and broadness of tuning did not vary. In simulations we could not reproduce our results using a model that had only div and curl detectors, but we could reproduce them if we allowed for detectors tuned for a broad range of spiral pitches. Our results suggest that humans encode the complex motion of surfaces by detectors tuned to many different types of motion and that the detectors are invariant across space in their properties.
  • References (61)
    61 references, page 1 of 7

    Addams, R. (1834). Ah account of a peculiar optical phaenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body etc. London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 3rd series, 5, 373-374.

    Albright, T D. (1984). Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual arca MT of the macaque.Journal of Neuroptyysiology, 52, 1106-1130.

    Albright, T D. (1989). Centrifugal directional bias in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque. Visual Neuroscience, 2, 177-188.

    Ball, K., & Sekuler, R. (1980). Human vision favors centrifugal motion. Perception, 9, 317-325.

    Blake, R., & Hiris, E. (1993). Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 33, 1589-1592.

    Bonnet, C. (1982). Thresholds of motion perception. In A. H. Wertheim, W. A. Wagenaar, & H. W. Leibowitz (Eds.), Tutor# als on motion perception. New York: Plenum Press.

    Bonnet, C., & Pouthas, V. (1972). Interactions between spatial and kinetic dimensions in the movement aftereffect. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 193-200.

    B¡ K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T., & Movshon, J. A. (1993). Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals. Visual Neuroscience, 10, 1157- 1169.

    Broerse, J., Shaw, C., Dodwell, P., & Muir, D. (1994). Colored aftereffects contingent on global transformations? Spatial Vision, 8, 95-117.

    Cavanagh, P, & Favreau, O. E. (1980). Motion aftercffect: A global mechanism for the perception of rotation. Perception, 9, 175-182.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark