Institutional investors as stewards of the corporation: Exploring the challenges to the monitoring hypothesis

Article English OPEN
Ivanova, Mila;

The study explores the challenges UK-based institutional investors face when trying to monitor investee companies and influence their social, environmental and governance practices. Consistent with previous research, I find that misalignment of interests within the inve... View more
  • References (106)
    106 references, page 1 of 11

    Aggarwal, R., Erel, I., Ferreira, M., & Matos, P. (2011). Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 154-181.

    Agrawal, A. K. (2012). Corporate governance objectives of labor union shareholders: Evidence from proxy voting. Review of Financial Studies, 25(1), 187-226.

    Agrawal, A., & Mandelker, N. (1992). Shark repellents and the role of institutional investors in corporate governance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 13(1), 15-22.

    Aguilera, R., Williams, C., Conley, J., & Rupp, D. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147-157.

    Almazan, A., Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. (2005). Active institutional shareholders and costs of monitoring: Evidence from executive compensation. Financial Management, 34(4), 5-34.

    Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London: Sage.

    Back, K., Li, T., & Ljungqvist, A. (2015). Liquidity and governance. ECGI - Finance working paper No. 388. Available at SSRN: abstract=2350362.

    Bakan, J. (2005). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. (2010). Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK focus fund. Review of Financial Studies, 22(8), 3093-3129.

    Becht, M., & Roell, A. (1999). Blockholding in Europe: An international comparison. European Economic Review, 43(4-6), 1049-1056.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark