Two experiments examined the effect of output order in immediate serial recall (ISR). In Experiment 1, three groups of participants saw lists of 8 words and wrote down the words in the rows corresponding to their serial positions in an 8-row response grid. One group was... View more
Baddeley, A.D. (2000). The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: Some comments on Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 544-549.
Baddeley, A., & Larsen, J.D. (2003). The disruption of STM: A response to our commentators. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1301-1306.
Beaman, C.P. (2002). Inverting the modality effect in serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 371-389.
Beaman, C. P., & Morton, J. (2000). The separate but related origins of the recency and the modality effect in free recall. Cognition, 77, B59-B65.
Brown, G.D.A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2002). A ratio model of scale-invariant memory and identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Brown, G.D.A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107, 127-181.
Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106, 551- 581.
Cowan, N., Saults, J.S., & Brown, G.D.A. (2004). On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: Separating input and output factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 639-644.
Cowan, N., Saults, J.S., Elliott, E.M., & Moreno, M. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 153-177.
Crowder, R.G. (1969). Behavioral strategies in immediate memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 524-528.