Evaluative Conditioning Is Pavlovian Conditioning: Issues of Definition, Measurement, and the Theoretical Importance of Contingency Awareness

Article English OPEN
Field, Andy P (2000)

In her commentary of Field (1999), Hammerl (1999) has drawn attention to several interesting points concerning the issue of contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning. First, she comments on several contentious issues arising from Field's review of the evaluative conditioning literature, second she critiques the data from his pilot study and finally she argues the case that EC is a distinct form of conditioning that can occur in the absence of contingency awareness. With reference to these criticisms, this reply attempts to address Hammerl's comments by exploring the issues of how awareness is defined, how it is best measured, and whether it is reasonable to believe that EC uniformly occurs in the absence of contingency awareness. The article concludes that the available evidence supports Field's proposition that EC is, in fact, Pavlovian learning.
  • References (25)
    25 references, page 1 of 3

    Allen, C. T., & Janiszewski, C. A. (1989). Assessing the role of contingency awareness in attitudinal conditioning with implications for advertising research. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 30-43.

    Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., & van den Bergh, O. (1990). Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective-evaluative learning. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 3-18.

    Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., & Crombez, G. (1995). Pavlovian associations are forever: On classical conditioning and extinction. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 127-141.

    Baeyens, F., Crombez, G., van den Bergh, O., & Eelen, P. (1988). Once in contact always in contact: Evaluative conditioning is resistant to extinction. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 10, 179-199.

    Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., van den Bergh, O., & Crombez, G. (1990). Flavour-flavour and colour-flavour conditioning in humans. Learning and Motivation, 21, 434-455.

    Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., van den Bergh, O., & Crombez, G. (1992). The content of learning in human evaluative conditioning: Acquired valence is sensitive to US-revaluation. Learning and Motivation, 23, 200-224.

    Darley, W. K., & Lim, J.-S. (1993). Assessing demand artefacts in consumer research: An alternative perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 489-495.

    Davey, G. C. L. (1987). The integration of human and animal models of Pavlovian conditioning: associations, cognitions and attributions. In G. C. L. Davey (ed.), Cognitive processes and Pavlovian conditioning in humans (pp 83-113). John Wiley: Chichester.

    Field, A. P., & Davey, G. C. L. (1998). Evaluative conditioning: Arte-fact or -fiction?- A reply to Baeyens, De Houwer, Vansteenwegen & Eelen (1998). Learning and Motivation. 29, 475-491.

    Fulcher, E. P., & Cocks, R. P. (1997). Dissociative storage systems in human evaluative conditioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35 (1), 1-10.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Sussex Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 167
Share - Bookmark