Assertiveness and anxiety effects in traditional and online Interactions

Article English OPEN
Baker, Amy E. ; Jeske, Debora (2015)
  • Publisher: IGI Global
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.4018/IJCBPL.2015070103
  • Subject: C800
    mesheuropmc: behavior and behavior mechanisms | humanities | social sciences

The present study explored the extent to which self-esteem is a significant predictor of social network use and the level of anxiety and assertiveness participants feel during traditional and online interactions. Using a survey design (N=184), it was found that lower self esteem was not associated with more intensive social network use, in contrast to the social compensationn theory. Self-esteem was a significant negative predictor of social anxiety as well as a positive predictor of assertiveness in traditional and online settings. Higher social anxiety was also associated with lower social assertiveness in both settings. Exploratory results showed that participants who engaged more frequently in online activities also reported significantly higher levels of assertiveness and lower levels of anxiety.\ud These findings suggest that online behaviors reflect\ud different personality characteristics, with self-esteem\ud being an important variable to consider in the\ud exploration of online behaviors and experiences.
  • References (10)

    Caplan, S. E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic Internet use. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 721-736. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03019.x Caplan, S. E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(2), 234-242. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9963 PMID:17474841 Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D. Hope, & F. Schneier (Eds.), Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment And Treatment (pp. 69-93). New York: Guilford.

    Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392-414.

    doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392 PMID:15122925 Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1-2), 79-83. doi:10.1089/ cyber.2009.0411 PMID:21329447 Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233. http://www.jstor.org/stable/202051 doi:10.2307/202051 Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. The Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 75-90. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00249 Harman, J. P., Hansen, C. E., Cochran, M. E., & Lindsey, C. R. (2005). Liar, liar: Internet faking but not frequency of use affects social skills, self-esteem, social anxiety. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 1-6.

    doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.1 PMID:15738687 Johnston, K., Tanner, M., Lalla, N., & Kawalski, D. (2013). Social capital: The benefit of Facebook 'friends'.

    Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(1), 24-36. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2010.550063 Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., & Morris, J. (2011). The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 183-189.

    doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0061 PMID:21192765 Krämer, N., & Winter, S. (2008). Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20(3), 106-116. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.20.3.106 Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). The Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being. The American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1032. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 PMID:9841579 Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM, 721-730.

    Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2 Park, N., Jin, B., & Jin, S.-A. (2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1974-1983. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.004 Rauch, S. M., Strobel, C., Bella, M., Odachowski, Z., & Bloom, C. (2014). Face to face versus Facebook: Does exposure to social networking web sites augment or attenuate physiological arousal among the socially anxious? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(3), 187-190. doi:10.1089/ cyber.2012.0498 PMID:24180223 Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press.

    Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009). Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 578-586. doi:10.1016/j.

    chb.2008.12.024 Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who use Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the 'Big Five', shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1658-1664. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004 Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and model. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 641-669. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.641 PMID:7156261 Wilson, K., Fornasier, S., & White, K. M. (2010). Psychological predictors of young adults' use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(2), 173-177. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0094 PMID:20528274 Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences.

    Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203-220. doi:10.1177/1745691612442904 Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 1-34. doi:10.1111/j.1083- 6101.2008.01429.x

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark