Comparison of algorithms that detect drug side effects using electronic healthcare databases

Article, Preprint English OPEN
Reps, Jenna M. ; Garibaldi, Jonathan M. ; Aickelin, Uwe ; Soria, Daniele ; Gibson, Jack E. ; Hubbard, Richard B. (2013)
  • Publisher: Springer
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1007/s00500-013-1097-4
  • Subject: Computer Science - Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science | Computer Science - Learning

The electronic healthcare databases are starting to become more readily available and are thought to have excellent potential for generating adverse drug reaction signals. The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database is an electronic healthcare database containing medical information on over 11 million patients that has excellent potential for detecting ADRs. In this paper we apply four existing electronic healthcare database signal detecting algorithms (MUTARA, HUNT, Temporal Pattern Discovery and modified ROR) on the THIN database for a selection of drugs from six chosen drug families. This is the first comparison of ADR signalling algorithms that includes MUTARA and HUNT and enabled us to set a benchmark for the adverse drug reaction signalling ability of the THIN database. The drugs were selectively chosen to enable a comparison with previous work and for variety. It was found that no algorithm was generally superior and the algorithms' natural thresholds act at variable stringencies. Furthermore, none of the algorithms perform well at detecting rare ADRs.
  • References (28)
    28 references, page 1 of 3

    1. Almeno , J., Tonning, J.M., Gould, A.L., et al: Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 28(11), 981{1007 (2005)

    2. Alvarez-Requejo, A., Carvajal, A., Begaud, B., et al: Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions- estimate based on a spontaneous reporting scheme and a sentinel system. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 54(6), 483{488 (1998)

    3. Bate, A., Lindquist, M., Edwards, I.R., et al: A bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 54, 315{321 (1998)

    4. Behrman, R.E., Benner, J.S., Brown, J.S., et al: Developing the sentinel system - a national resource for evidence development. N Engl J Med 364, 498{499 (2011)

    5. Brown, J.S., Kulldor , M., Chan, A., et al: Early detection of adverse drug events within population-based health networks: application of sequential testing methods. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16, 1275{1284 (2007)

    6. Coloma, P.M., Schuemie, M.J., Tri ro, G., et al: Combining electronic healthcare databases in europe to allow for large-scale drug safety monitoring: the eu-adr project. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 20, 1{11 (2011)

    7. Curtis, J.R., Cheng, H., Delzell, E., et al: Adaptation of bayesian data mining algorithms to longitudinal claims data: coxib safety as an example. Med Care 46, 969{975 (2008)

    8. DuMouchel, W.: Bayesian data mining in large frequency tables, with an application to the FDA spontaneous reporting systemt. Amer Statistician 53(3), 177{190 (1999)

    9. Evans, S.J.W., Waller, P.C., Davis, S.: Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol and Drug Saf 10(6), 483{486 (2001)

    10. INPS, A Cegedim Company: Welcome to inps, http://www.inps4.co.uk/ (2011, accessed 25 jan 2012)

  • Similar Research Results (1)
  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark