The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol

Article English OPEN
Phillips, Gemma (2010)

Background: The application of mobile computing and communication technology is rapidly expanding in the fields of health care and public health. This systematic review will summarise the evidence for the effectiveness of mobile technology interventions for improving health and health service outcomes (M-health) around the world. Findings: To be included in the review interventions must aim to improve or promote health or health service use and quality, employing any mobile computing and communication technology. This includes: (1) interventions designed to improve diagnosis, investigation, treatment, monitoring and management of disease; (2) interventions to deliver treatment or disease management programmes to patients, health promotion interventions, and interventions designed to improve treatment compliance; and (3) interventions to improve health care processes e.g. appointment attendance, result notification, vaccination reminders. A comprehensive, electronic search strategy will be used to identify controlled studies, published since 1990, and indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, or the UK NHS Health Technology Assessment database. The search strategy will include terms (and synonyms) for the following mobile electronic devices (MEDs) and a range of compatible media: mobile phone; personal digital assistant (PDA); handheld computer (e.g. tablet PC); PDA phone (e.g. BlackBerry, Palm Pilot); Smartphone; enterprise digital assistant; portable media player (i.e. MP3 or MP4 player); handheld video game console. No terms for health or health service outcomes will be included, to ensure that all applications of mobile technology in public health and health services are identified. Bibliographies of primary studies and review articles meeting the inclusion criteria will be searched manually to identify further eligible studies. Data on objective and self-reported outcomes and study quality will be independently extracted by two review authors. Where there are sufficient numbers of similar interventions, we will calculate and report pooled risk ratios or standardised mean differences using meta-analysis. Discussion: This systematic review will provide recommendations on the use of mobile computing and communication technology in health care and public health and will guide future work on intervention development and primary research in this field.
  • References (32)
    32 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Blaya JA, Fraser HS, Holt B: E-health technologies show promise in developing countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010, 29:244-251.

    2. Lindquist AM, Johansson PE, Petersson GI, Saveman B-I, Nilsson GC: The use of the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) among personnel and students in health care: a review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2008, 10:e31.

    3. Cole-Lewis H, Kershaw T: Text Messaging as a Tool for Behavior Change in Disease Prevention and Management. Epidemiol Rev 2010.

    4. Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL, Miller YD: Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2009, 165-173.

    5. Heron KE, Smyth JM: Ecological momentary interventions: Incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol 2010, 15:1-39.

    6. Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas EA: Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. Telemedicine Journal & E-Health 2009, 15:231-240.

    7. Leach-Lemens C: Using mobile phones in HIV care and prevention. HIV & AIDS Treatment in Practice 2009, 137:7.

    8. Burton C, Weller D, Sharpe M: Are electronic diaries useful for symptoms research? A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2007, 62:553-561.

    9. Dale O, Hagen KB: Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2007, 60:8-17.

    10. Lane SJ, Heddle NM, Arnold E, Walker I: A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making 2006, 6:23.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    ROAR at University of East London - IRUS-UK 0 32
Share - Bookmark