Inconsistency in 9 mm bullets : correlation of jacket thickness to post-impact geometry measured with non-destructive X-ray computed tomography

Article English OPEN
Thornby, J. A. ; Landheer, D. ; Williams, T. ; Barnes-Warden, J. ; Fenne, P. ; Norman, D. G. ; Attridge, A. ; Williams, M. A. (2014)
  • Publisher: Elsevier
  • Subject: U1 | TA

Fundamental to any ballistic armour standard is the reference projectile to be defeated. Typically, for certification purposes, a consistent and symmetrical bullet geometry is assumed, however variations in bullet jacket dimensions can have far reaching consequences. Traditionally, characteristics and internal dimensions have been analysed by physically sectioning bullets – an approach which is of restricted scope and which precludes subsequent ballistic assessment. The use of a non-destructive X-ray computed tomography (CT) method has been demonstrated and validated Kumar et al., 2011); the authors now apply this technique to correlate bullet impact response with jacket thickness variations. A set of 20 bullets (9 mm DM11) were selected for comparison and an image-based analysis method was employed to map jacket thickness and determine the centre of gravity of each specimen. Both intra- and inter-bullet variations were investigated, with thickness variations of the order of 200 um commonly found along the length of all bullets and angular variations of up to 50 um in some. The bullets were subsequently impacted against a rigid flat plate under controlled conditions (observed on a high-speed video camera) and the resulting deformed projectiles were re-analysed. The results of the experiments demonstrate a marked difference in ballistic performance between bullets from different manufacturers and an asymmetric thinning of the jacket is observed in regions of pre-impact weakness. The conclusions are relevant for future soft armour standards and provide important quantitative data for numerical model correlation and development. The implications of the findings of the work on the reliability and repeatability of the industry standard V50 ballistic test are also discussed.
  • References (24)
    24 references, page 1 of 3

    [1] P.J.T. Knudsen, P. Theilade; Terminal ballistics of the 7.62 mm NATO bullet autopsy findings, Int. J. Legal Med., 106 (2) (1993), pp. 61-67

    [2] P.J.T. Knudsen, J.S. Vigsanaes, R. Rosmussen, P.S. Nissen; Terminal ballistics of the 7.62 mm NATO bullets: experiments in ordnance gelatine, Int. J. Legal Med., 108 (1995), pp. 62-67

    [3] W.J. Taylor Jr., J.R. Vinson; Modeling ballistic impact into flexible materials, AIAA J., 28 (12) (1990), pp. 2098-2103

    [4] T.G. Montgomery, P.L. Grady, C. Tomasino; The effects of projectile geometry on the performance of ballistic fabrics, Textile Res. J., 52 (7) (1982), pp. 442-450

    [5] H. Kurtaran, M. Buyuk, M. Eskandarian; Ballistic impact simulation of GT model vehicle door using finite element method, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 40 (2) (2003), pp. 113-121

    [6] G. Ben-Dor, A. Dubinsky, T. Elperin; Ballistic impact, recent advances in analytical modelling of plate penetration dynamics - a review, Appl. Mech. Rev., Trans. ASME, 58 (2005), pp. 355-371

    [7] D.S. Preece, V.S. Berg; Bullet impact on steel and Kevlar steel armor - computer modeling and experimental data, The Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference - Symposium on Structures Under Extreme Loading (July 2004), pp. 25-29

    [8] V.B.C. Tan, T.W. Ching; Computational simulation of fabric armour subjected to ballistic impacts, Int. J. Impact Eng., 32 (11) (2006), pp. 1737-1751

    [9] P. Gotts, M. Tawell, S. Holden; Variations in ammunition used for testing personal armour, Personal Armour Systems Symposium (PASS 2010), September 13-17, Quebec, Canada (2010)

    [10] R.P. Bixter, C.R. Ahrens, R.P. Rossi, D. Thickman; Bullet identification with radiography, Radiology, 178 (1991), pp. 563-567

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark