Multinationality-performance relationship:a meta-analysis

Article English OPEN
Yang, Yong ; Driffield, Nigel (2012)

We conduct a Meta-analysis of 54 papers that study the relationship between multinationality and firm performance. The aim is to understand if any systematic relationships exist between the characteristics of each study and the reported results of linear and curvilinear regressions to examine the multinationality-performance relationship. Our main finding, robust to different specifications and to different weights for each observation, is that when analysis is based on non-US data, the reported return to multinationality is higher. However, this relationship for non-US firms is usually U-shaped rather than inverted U-shaped. This indicates that US firms face lower returns to internationalization than other firms but are less likely to incur losses in the early stages of internationalization. The findings also highlight the differences that are reported when comparing regression and non-regression based techniques. Our results suggest that in this area regression based analysis is more reliable than say ANOVA or other related approaches. Other characteristics that influence the estimated rate of return and its shape across different studies are: the measure of multinationality used; size distribution of the sample; and the use of market-based indicators to measure firm performance. Finally, we find no evidence of publication bias.
  • References (73)
    73 references, page 1 of 8

    AL-Obaidan, A. M., & Scully, G. W. (1995). The theory and measurement of the net benefits of multinationality: The case of the international petroleum industry. Applied Economics, 27(2), 231-238.

    Allen, L., & Pantzalis, C. (1996). Valuation of the operating flexibility of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4), 633-653.

    Andersen, J. T. (2005). The performance and risk management implication of multinationality: An industry perspective. SMG Working Paper 10.

    Andersen, J. T. (2008). Multinational performance relationship and industry context. SMG Working paper 15.

    Ashenfelter, O., Harmon, C., Oosterbeek, H. (1999). A review of estimates of the schooling/earnings relationship, with tests for publication bias. Labour Economics, 6(4), 453-470.

    Autio, E., Heikki, L., Arenius, P. (2002). Emergent "Born Globals": Crafting early and rapid internationalization strategies in technology-based new firms. Helsinki University of Technology Working Paper Series 91-WP-2002-003.

    Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. (2000). Comparing Processes and Born Global Perspectives in the

    international growth of Technology-Based New Firms, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College pp. 413-424.

    Bausch, A., & Krist, M. (2007). The effect of context-related moderators on the internationalization -performance relationship: Evidence from meta-analysis. Management International Review, 47(3), 319-347.

    Bodnar, G. M., Tang, C., Weintrop, J. (1999). Both sides of corporate diversification: The value impacts of geographic and industrial diversification. NBER Working Paper 6224.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Aston Publications Explorer - IRUS-UK 0 39
Share - Bookmark