The role of companions in outpatient seizure clinic interactions: A pilot study

Article English OPEN
Robson, C. ; Drew, P. ; Reuber, M. (2016)
  • Publisher: Elsevier

Purpose: This study explored contributions that patients' companions (seizure witnesses) make to interactions in the seizure clinic and whether the nature of the companions' interactional contributions can help with the differentiation of epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES).\ud \ud Methods: Conversation analysis methods were used to examine video recordings and transcripts of neurologists' interactions with patients referred to a specialist seizure clinic and their companions.\ud \ud Results: The companions' behavior correlated with interactional features previously observed to distinguish patients with epilepsy from patients with PNES. Patients with PNES, but not those with epilepsy, tended to exhibit interactional resistance to the doctor's efforts to find out more about their seizure experiences and, thereby, encouraged greater interactional contribution from companions.\ud \ud Conclusion: The contributions that companions make (in part, prompted by patient's interactional behavior) may provide additional diagnostic pointers in this clinical setting, and a number of candidate features that may help clinicians distinguish between epilepsy and PNES when the patient is accompanied by a seizure witness are described.\ud \ud However, companion contributions may limit the doctor's ability to identify linguistic and interactional features with previously demonstrated diagnostic potential in the conversational contributions made by patients themselves. To help offset potential diagnostic losses, doctors may need to explicitly discuss the role of the companion in the consultation when a seizure witness (or another companion) accompanies the patient.
  • References (24)
    24 references, page 1 of 3

    [1] M. Schwabe, M. Reuber, M. Schoendienst, E. Guelich, Listening to people with seizures: how can linguistic analysis help in the differential diagnosis of seizure disorders?, Comm Med. 5, 2008, 59-72.

    [2] M, Reuber, C. Monzoni, B. Sharrack, L. Plug, Using interactional and linguistic analysis to distinguish between epileptic and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: A prospective, blinded multirater study, Epilepsy & Behav. 16, 2009, 139-144.

    [3] C. Robson, P. Drew, T. Walker, M. Reuber, Catastrophising and normalising in patient's accounts of their seizure experiences, Seizure. 21, 2012, 795-801.

    [4] D. Jones, P. Drew, C. Elsey, D. Blackburn, S. Wakefield, K. Harkness, M. Reuber, Conversational assessment in memory clinic encounters: interactional profiling for differentiating dementia from functional memory disorders. Aging Ment Health, 2010, 1-10. Available online ahead of print at:

    [5] C,M. Cornaggia, S.C. Gugliotta, A. Magaudda, R. Alfa, M. Beghi, M. Polita, Conversation analysis in the differential diagnosis of Italian patients with epileptic or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A blind prospective study, Epilepsy & Behav. 25 (2012) 598-604.

    [6] M. Reuber, Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: answers and questions, Epilepsy & Behav. 12, 2008, 622 635.

    [7] R.P. Lesser, Treatment and Outcome of Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures, Epilepsy Curr. 3, 2003, 198 200.

    [8] H. Angus-Leppan, Diagnosing epilepsy in neurology clinics: a prospective study, Seizure. 17 (2008) 431 436.

    [9] I.A. Kotsopoulos, M.C. de Krom, F.G. Kessels, J. Lodder, J. Troost, M. Twellaar, T. van Merode, A.J. Knottnerus, The diagnosis of epileptic and non-epileptic seizures, Epilepsy Res. 57, 2003, 59 67.

    [10] K. Malmgren, M. Reuber, R. Appleton, Differential diagnosis of epilepsy, in: S. Shorvon, M. Cook, R. Guerrini, S. Lhatoo (Eds.), Epilepsy: Oxford Textbook of Clinical Neurology Series, Oxford, 2012, pp. 81-94.

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    White Rose Research Online - IRUS-UK 0 26
Share - Bookmark