publication . Article . 2015

Assessment in anatomy

Erich Brenner; Chirculescu, A. R. M.; Reblet, C.; Smith, C.;
  • Published: 01 Jan 2015
  • Country: United Kingdom
Abstract
From an educational perspective, a very important problem is that of assessment, for establishing competency and as selection criterion for different professional purposes. Among the issues to be addressed are the methods of assessment and/or the type of tests, the range of scores, or the definition of honour degrees. The methods of assessment comprise such different forms such as the spotter examination, short or long essay questions, short answer questions, true-false questions, single best answer questions, multiple choice questions, extended match questions, or several forms of oral approaches such as viva voce examinations.Knowledge about this is important ...
Subjects
free text keywords: QM0001
16 references, page 1 of 2

critical care in surgery. Med Teach, 19(3): 190-193.

FLEXNER A (1910) Medical education in the United States and Canada. A report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, New York.

FLEXNER A (2002) Medical education in the United States and Canada. Bull World Health Organ, 80(7): 594-602. [OpenAIRE]

GARG AX, NORMAN G, SPEROTABLE L (2001) How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet, 357(9253): 363-364.

GIBBS G, HABESHAW T (1989) Preparing to teach. An Introduction to effective teaching in higher education. Technical & Educational Services Ltd, Bristol.

Guilbert J-J (1998) Classification of professional tasks into three domains: practical, communication and intellectual skills. In: GUILBERT J-J (ed). Educational Handbook for Health Personnel. World Health Organisation, Geneva, 1.50-51.54.

MILLER GE (1990) The assessment of clinical skills/ competence/performance. Acad Med, 65(9): S63-67.

MORRIS J, CHIRCULESCU A (2007) Structure and assessment of a short intense clinical anatomy course shortly before clinical studies. Eur J Anat, 11(S1): 95-98.

NORCINI JJ (2003) Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ, 37(5): 464-469.

PEEL S (1998) An innovative problem-solving assessment for groups of first-year medical undergraduatesThink Tanks. Med Educ, 32(1): 35-39.

SCHUBERT S, SCHNABEL KP, WINKELMANN A (2009) Assessment of spatial anatomical knowledge with a 'three-dimensional multiple choice test' (3D-MC). Med Teach, 31(1): 13-17.

SIMPSON E (1971) Educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. In: KAPFER MB (ed). Behavioral Objectives in Curriculum Development: Selected Readings and Bibliography. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 60-67.

HARROW AJ (1972) A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain. David McKey, New York.

SINCLAIR DC (1965) An experiment in the teaching of anatomy. Acad Med, 40(5): 401-413.

HEYLINGS D (2002) Anatomy 1999-2000: the curriculum, who teaches it and how? Med Educ, 36(8): 702-710.

16 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue