Nation branding in the post-broadcast era: The case of RT

Article English OPEN
Miazhevich, Galina;
(2018)

The article examines Russia’s international multinational broadcaster RT (formerly Russia Today), which was launched in 2005 with the direct support of the Russian government. RT promotes a distinct ‘counter-hegemonic’ brand of broadcasting. This article goes beyond RT’... View more
  • References (18)
    18 references, page 1 of 2

    Anholt S. (2003) Brand New Justice: The upside of global branding. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford.

    Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity At Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Aronczyk M. (2013) Branding the Nation: The Global Business of National Identity. Oxford: University Press.

    Bennet W. L and Segerberg, A. (2012) The logic of connective action, Information, Communication & Society, 15 (5): 739-768.

    Dougherty J. (2013) Russia's 'soft power' strategy, MA dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, USA. Available from: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/709790/Dougherty_g eorgetown_0076M_12414.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 12 July 2016).

    Economist (2016, 14 September) The Economist explains: What are the Minsk agreements? The Economist. Available from: http://www.economist.com/blogs/economistexplains/2016/09/economist-explains-7 (accessed 12 December 2016).

    Entman R. M. (1993) Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43 (4): 51-58.

    Feklyunina, V. (2008) Battle for Perceptions: Projecting Russia in the West, Europe-Asia Studies, 60 (4): 605-629.

    Hall T. (2010) An Unclear Attraction: A Critical Examination of Soft Power as an Analytical Category, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3 (2): 189-211.

    Hutchings S., Gillespie M., Yablokov I., Lvov I., and Voss A. (2015) Staging the Sochi Winter Olympics 2014 on Russia Today and BBC World News: From soft power to geopolitical crisis. Participations: Journal of audience and reception studies, 12 (1): 630-658.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark