Shareholder activism and the ethical\ud harnessing of institutional investors:\ud The unique case of ShareAction

Article English OPEN
Ivanova, Mila (2016)

Purpose – This study aims to foster a deeper understanding of socio-ethical shareholder activism by outlining the corporate campaigning strategies of a UK based NGO and by assessing their impact on both institutional investors and the practices of two multinational companies. As we move into a world where shareholder ownership is becoming more democratised, shareholder activism is gaining prominence in the US, Europe and Asia, opening new avenues for participation in corporate governance by stakeholders such as NGOs who have traditionally been uninvolved in corporate decisions.\ud \ud Design/methodology/approach – The article adopts a qualitative methodology and case study research design. It relies on semi-structured interviews, analysis of documents and participant observation.\ud \ud Findings – The study sheds light into the ways in which NGOs are connecting themselves to the financial sector. It argues that they can pursue their political goals by framing their arguments in a way that emphasises the short-term financial risks/benefits for investors. Second, it demystifies the term ‘shareholder activism’, transforming it from an action tool belonging only to big and powerful institutions, to a tool which gives other stakeholders such as NGOs and ordinary people a real stake in companies’ affairs. What is more, the study highlights the divergent nature of institutional shareholder activist intervention in the US and the UK.\ud \ud Research limitation/implications – Given the generally long-term nature of shareholder campaigns, which can sometimes span over several years, it could have been beneficial to adopt a longitudinal research design. Future research can endeavour to focus on a number of different campaigns over a period that exceeds three years.\ud \ud Practical implications – The research has implications for NGOs adopting a shareholder activist campaigning model and for policy makers aiming to encourage investor stewardship. \ud \ud Originality/value – The fact that the research field of socio-ethical shareholder activism is relatively new and under-explored by academia, coupled with the growing incidence of the phenomenon in the UK and across the world, as well as its potential benefits for society as a whole, renders further investigation into the topic necessary.
  • References (7)

    Anderson, S., Cavanagh, J. and Lee, T. (2005), Field Guide to the Global Economy 2nd ed, New Press, New York.

    Bakan, J. (2006), The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, Constable, London.

    Becht, M., Franks, J. R. and Grant, J. (2010), “Hedge Fund Activism in Europe”, working paper No. 283/2010, ECGI - Finance, 26 May.

    Clark G., Salo J. and Hebb T. (2006), “Shareholder Activism in the Public Spotlight: Social Investors' Resolutions at US Corporate Annual Meetings, 2001-2004”, Pensions at Work, University of Toronto, available at: (accessed 30 November 2012).

    Cragg, W. (2000), “Human Rights and Business Ethics: Fashioning a New Social Contract”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 27 No. 1/2, pp. 205-214.

    Neubaum D.O. and Zahra S.A. (2006), “Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Effects of Investment Horizon, Activism and Coordination”, Journal of Management, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 108-131.

    after-all-ethical-investment-chief-takes-on-the-system-1977537.html February 2014).

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository

    The information is available from the following content providers:

    From Number Of Views Number Of Downloads
    Online Research @ Cardiff - IRUS-UK 0 65
Share - Bookmark