Respite: carers’ experiences and perceptions of respite at home

Article English OPEN
Greenwood, Nan ; Habibi, Ruth ; Mackenzie, Ann (2012)
  • Publisher: BioMed Central
  • Journal: BMC Geriatrics, volume 12, pages 42-42 (eissn: 1471-2318)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-42, pmc: PMC3528615
  • Subject: Research Article | health | Geriatrics and Gerontology
    mesheuropmc: humanities | human activities | health care economics and organizations | social sciences | health care facilities, manpower, and services

Background - Informal carers play an important role in supporting people with long term conditions living at home.\ud However, the caring role is known to have adverse effects on carers such as poorer emotional health and\ud social isolation. A variety of types of respite may be offered to carers but little is known about carers’\ud experiences of respite and their perceptions of care workers and of the benefits of respite. This study therefore\ud investigated these experiences and perceptions.\ud Method - Recorded, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with twelve carers receiving weekly four hourly\ud respite. Carers were either caring for a person over sixty or were over sixty themselves. Interviews were\ud analysed thematically.\ud Results and Discussion - Respite sometimes alleviated carers’ constant sense of responsibility for their cared for. Trust, whether trust\ud in the service provider or individual care workers, was essential. Carers lacking this trust tended to perceive\ud respite as less beneficial. Low expectations were common with carers frequently unwilling to find fault. Care\ud workers were frequently seen as very kind with some carers valuing their company. Care workers who were\ud flexible, communicated well and responded to the cared for’s needs were valued. Stimulation of the cared for\ud during respite was very important to most carers but the perceived benefits for carers were often very\ud individual. Many carers used respite to catch up with routine, domestic tasks rarely using it to socialise.\ud Conclusions - For many carers, respite was a way of maintaining normality in often difficult, restricted lives. Respite\ud allowed continuation of what most people take for granted. Carers frequently viewed respite as intended to\ud improve their cared for’s quality of life, rather than their own. This centrality of the cared for means that\ud carers can only really benefit from respite if the cared for is happy and also seen to benefit. Future research\ud 3\ud should investigate the perspectives of carers and their cared for, focussing on different demographic groups by\ud features such as age, gender, ethnic and diagnostic groups. However, without greater clarity about what respite\ud is intended to achieve, clear evidence of a positive impact of this intervention may remain difficult to identify.
  • References (39)
    39 references, page 1 of 4

    1. Carers UK: Facts about carers. Policy briefing. London: Carers UK; 2009.

    2. Office for National Statistics:; 2009.

    3. Kramer BJ: Gain in the caregiving experience: Where are we? What next? Gerontologist 1997, 37:218-232.

    4. Cohen CA, Colantonio A, Vernich L: Positive aspects of caregiving: rounding out the caregiver experience. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002, 17:184-188.

    5. Habermann B, Davis LL: Caring for Family with Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease. J Gerontol Nurs 2005, 31(6):49-53.

    6. Tarlow BJ, Stephen RW, Rubert M, Ory MG, Gallagher-Thompson D: Positive aspects of caregiving. Res Aging 2004, 26(4):429-453.

    7. Mackenzie A, Greenwood N: Positive aspects of caregiving in stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2012, doi:10.3109/09638288.2011.650307.

    8. Parker G, Arksey H, Harden M: Meta-review of international evidence on interventions to support carers. University of York: Social Policy Research Unit; Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Working Paper No. DH 2394; 2010.

    9. Bass D, McClendon M, Deimling G, Mukherjee S: The influence of a diagnosed mental impairment on family caregiver strain. J Gerontol 1994, 49:S146-155.

    10. Drentea P, Clay OJ, Roth D, Mittelman MS: Predictors of improvement in social support: Five-year effects of a structured intervention for caregivers of spouses with Alzheimer's disease. Soc Sci Med 2006, 63:957-967.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark